Comment Re:So OpenAI are criminals? (Score 1) 127
You are deeply delusional. And you have no clue what "state level actors" can actually do.
You are deeply delusional. And you have no clue what "state level actors" can actually do.
You seem to be mentally defective because you hallucinate things opposite to observable reality.
Obviously. But why were they not in place?
You wish. But you just exposed yourself as a member of the "cult of AI". You seem to think AI is magic. It is not.
Well, you are clearly an anti-human cretin. So that fits.
No, you do not "think" that. You "believe" that because you failed to find out what you are talking about. Model collapse cannot be avoided. Period. This is mathematically proven and no amount of doubting on your part will change anything. The only thing that can be done is create training data using actual intelligence and that is only available in humans. And since slop cannot be reliably identified, that is a very high effort activity once they have stolen and contaminated everything online.
Obviously not. Then they would admit they have no clue. They are at least smart enough to see that. Well, most are.
And clearly some of these people of significant negative worth to society are here and have mod points. The future of the human race does not depend on getting climate change under control or war or hunger or disease. It depends on getting these people under control.
You fell for the propaganda.
What do you do for that student? You allow them to bring a summary of the material, that they have written themselves. On paper. I have done that for about 10 years now, with excellent results and high satisfaction levels from the students.
So the deception is more elaborate. So what? Like things like this have not been done before and like both involved parties do not desperately need news of the "LLMs are massively powerful!!!!" type.
In this case I need positive, independent proof this was not set up before I am going to believe what they claim.
Probably a troll. If not, then abjectly stupid. Would not rule out the second possibility.
Who do you think will keep things running when you retire? Right...
You are doing it wrong! Never click in any references! You may accidentally find out things and not be able to give an position that has no connection to reality anymore!
Social media does not need to be killed. It has its uses. But any intentional addictiveness must be punished and I mean prison time for the CEO. Any accidental addictiveness must be reduced to sane levels. We have other addictive things and we have a level in society where we tolerate them. Social media cannot remain the outlier that can be far worse unpunished.
That is a secondary goal, but one that the authoritarian assholes that want everybody watched all the time have had since the Internet became a thing. And these people are unfortunately everywhere, like a stink of rot that is always there once you look more closely.
The problem has been recognized as severe. Yes. That is a good thing. But the response to the problem is completely misguided and probably mostly ineffective. The problem is social media addictiveness and it does very much not only affect those younger than 15 years.
The first version always gets thrown away.