Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:And water is wet (Score 1) 39

The phrase is in the original link you provided and sources information from the link I provided as a source. Looking at the data, if you average 25 over two years you are considered the most polluted cities in Europe, but if you look at the plume map I showed you whole regions the size of small European countries are blanket with up to 250+ temporarily. It’s pretty clear wildfire smoke, if you are downwind, far outstrips man made pollution by a factor of at least 10+ although much of it can be attributed to global warming and climate pattern shifts which really makes it man made and not natural.

Comment Re:And water is wet (Score 1) 39

Also, according to your link, half of the PM2.5 comes from natural sources (just as harmful, it’s the particles not the source that’s the problem)

“ Around half of the concentrations of PM that people in the UK are exposed to come from either naturally occurring sources, such as pollen and sea spray, or are transported to the UK from international shipping and other countries.”

Comment Re:And water is wet (Score 1) 39

This is about more than just soot though. PM2.5 is emitted by many other things, e.g. nuclear plants.

Wildfires provide the vast majority of PM2.5 and other sized particulates to my entire state. The skies turn brown and visibility can drop to 100 yards making travel at highway speeds dangerous, one day this year it was so bad my city became the most polluted PM2.5 city on the planet despite having very low other sources. Canada isn’t going to run out of forests to burn anytime soon, and the weather is only getting warmer while precipitation is more sporadic.

Comment Re:The only people who believe... (Score 1) 15

...that vibe coding is useful are the hypemongers, clueless wannabe techies who believe they can effortlessly get rich and clueless investors who understand nothing about tech but are desperate for the next big thing

I can vibe code a manned moon landing mission. We’re gonna need some astronauts and rockets and stuff, now DO IT!

Comment Re:Mobile Phones (Score 1) 15

just keep pasting in the errors, ad nauseam, and pray it eventually accidentally produces working code?

No, it’s the fun of hitting one mole over the head with a hammer, only to have another pop up complete with the entertaining ambiance it provides. If you don’t mobile game you won’t get it.

Comment Re:Pics or it didn't happen (Score 1) 15

No, they cannot be fabricated today and probably not ever be fabricated with typical processes either. This is a what if we were able to make any arrangement physically possible kind of study. Similar types of meta materials have been actually made and studied physically and are fairly well understood so it probably stands to reason if it’s built it would function similarly to the simulation. It’s really cool from a miniature sensor perspective, but camera performance is based on many things including aperture size and miniature lenses will never be better overall, just better for some compact and light weight applications.

Comment Re:"Vibe coding 'web developer' reduced to tears" (Score 1) 86

Neither of those. Extend the metaphor: "Using a coding co-pilot is kind of like giving a coffee pot to a smart six-year-old Can they do it? Possibly. Could they fail? Definitely. Therefore, they require supervision. Constant. Supervision. And *constructive* feedback. Why do you think parenting, teaching, and training is so hard?

The real question is how good is your insurance when your child suffers third degree burns over 70% of their body and is the final cost worth it?

Comment Re:Donâ(TM)t Forget Us! (Score 1) 176

No, you've mixed it up. The inconvenient truth is that we can't meaningfully reduce fossil fuels without incentivizing the change economically. And that is such a hard thing to do that politicians don't even discuss how to get started.

This is why tariffs on solar panels brought by both parties over the last two decades make no sense. If you actually want to preserve the environment, because it’s in national security interests as well as fucking common sense, then solar panels should be so cheap homeless people use perfectly good ones to sleep under because cardboard is too valuable. Domestic production was less than 1% at the time and now it’s about 1.8% with no possibility of actually competing because the vastly higher costs of domestic production make adoption financially unviable, meanwhile China is on goal to actually be renewable with almost twice the solar installed in may as the entire US last year because it’s cheap power. Instead of adding taxes to stop adoption, a trade war with no price floor would have been amazing and exactly what the world needed flooding the world with nearly free panels. China provided this and the money to keep domestic production afloat would have been trivial compared to the value of all that free power generation capacity, but the American people were taxed into not being able to take advantage so it’s the reverse of what you claim. The financial path was there but the American people were screwed out of cheaper energy by established interests looking to profit at the expense of everyone else.

Slashdot Top Deals

Memory fault - where am I?

Working...