Comment Re:Renewable+storage = reliable (Score 2) 188
Grid storage is almost diametrically opposed. Energy and power density almost don’t matter at all, if a lithium battery needs to be a ten foot cube, something 100 times less dense mass or power wise is only 46 feet. They can be extremely fragile, and not work under vibration or movement. Low cycle cost lifetime is extremely important. It’s also much more important to have a high efficiency of discharge energy to charge energy. So really lithiums only make sense in niche cases and it’s why pumped hydro is still the vast majority of stored kWh.
Comment Re:Pay attention to the timing (Score 1) 121
The "new electrical demand"
The data is from actual use in 2025.
You do need kilowatts to serve many image requests per second. You don't need much energy to serve a single AI request. You do need kilowatts to serve many per second.
An average text response takes 0.0003 KwH of energy, and 0.1s of server time. That much energy used per 0.1 second is about 10kW. My wording and your complaint was about a single hosting of an image, not thousands or millions. A single hosting of a screenshot uses about 0.0000004 Watt-hours (Wh) per year.
Comment Re:Pay attention to the timing (Score 1) 121
Comment Re:Pay attention to the timing (Score 1) 121
Comment Re:crime (Score 1) 121
Comment Re:Straight out of War Games (Score 1) 121
Reminds me of the scene in War Games where Joshua is playing the various games over and over and over: Jennifer: What is it doing? David Lightman: It's learning.
Was it even updating the information into its training or implementation layers beyond the instance of the agent? I’d say it was burning more natural gas than learning.
Comment Re:Translation: (Score 1) 94
Comment Re:Yawn. (Score 1) 167
but the fact that the recent advances have been so astonishing should at least give us pause.
It took life 3+ billion years, and we might replicate it in 3000 or 5000 years of technological development, but science is barely 2000 years old at the moment. It doesn’t matter how intelligent you can make a computer for the foreseeable future, it will be dependent on humans for everyone’s lifetime reading this, and far beyond. Sure, they could destroy the world, but it’s about a million times more likely by causing resource wars over climate change aggravated by their bottomless consumption before all these nonsense bedtime stories.
Comment Re:But their not a national security threat? (Score 1) 167
Otherwise, cut the crap already.
Let them spew crap all day, it’s far preferable to encouraging their agents to go on cyber crime sprees to try and drum up investors.
Comment Yawn. (Score 1) 167
Humans are self healing, self replicating, insanely efficient (probably pushing the limits of efficiency baked into physics), machines able to adapt, evolve, and are broadly intelligent. The natural technology they are based on is so many thousands of years more advanced at the current exponential rate that they are indistinguishable from magic.
Wake me up when I can pull a chunk off my server, drop it in some hydrocarbons, irradiate it with UV, and have a brand new complete server (with ram and storage), all in a few months.
Comment Re:Nope (Score 2) 160
Comment Re:Shocking not shocking (Score 0) 166
And why do I want to stick with hybrids?
If you did own an EV, you'd probably just do the bulk of your charging at home. That's what most of us do.
Because in business school it’s taught that the price of a product has nothing to do with the cost of a product. It the highest price you can get people to pay for it. Since people pay for gasoline, then that’s the price per mile despite commercial electricity being 3-5x cheaper. Even at home it’s 2.5-3x cheaper on average.
Comment Re:Different worlds (Score 1) 500
The problem is that China has subsidized these vehicles to produce them below cost.
No, this is an amazing advantage for everyone, just maybe not so good for a few people who take the work of millions as their own. The simple fix is to properly subsidize American products, not necessarily even tariffs as they make everything more expensive. Right now cars and vehicles are in an affordability crisis and vastly dropping the price would be amazing for sales. We can easily afford to subsidize companies in a responsible way, it’s money better spent on strategic defense than hundreds of billions into overinflated missile and drone costs that make the military no longer viable in modern warfare.
Comment Re:Can't compete (Score 1) 500
The US produces more manufacturing output than every other country on earth other than China.
While it’s true that only 15% - 50% of components or base materials are sourced from foreign sources, only 10-15% of products in general rely solely on American manufacturing. No cars or vehicles are 100% American made. No laptops or computers either. In the case of another world war, we wouldn’t fare anything like the last time where we were far more self sufficient.