You could mine Bitcoin, I suppose, but the obvious thing to do would be charge up your EV. Energy storage on wheels!
This is a good argument to move from a level 1 or slow level 2 charger to a high power level 2 charger. You can reasonably get a 11.5kW charger in the US, our slow chargers are usually around 1.8kW. While Europe has 2.3-3kw and go to 11 or even 22kW if your home has 3 phase power. If your vehicle can support it you will be able to get over 7x the free electricity and perhaps full charges for free.
And turn down the volume of the ads. Last time I went to the cinema I damn near walked out because the ads were downright deafening - louder that the movie soundtrack. Paying to see a movie is one thing but I strongly object to having to pay to watch a bunch of adverts.
Maybe they can make up for it by dramatically raising prices both of the movie and concessions.
Soon any copyrighted shape.
If not sooner any part for any intellectual property of any design of any kind. It really gets under the skins of companies when instead of being forced to buy a cheap plastic part for hundreds of dollars you can just print it for a few dollars of filament.
Nor do they care. It is all about what the electorate, which knows even less, thinks about the idea.
This is about stopping right to repair, and guns are being used as the boogeyman to frighten people into accepting it. Monied interests would ban all 3-D printing if they could.
Not really. Barrels are consumables. They need occasional replacement.
Yes really. Where is there a law limiting the number of guns you may own? Simply buy a new barrel, you’re done it’s repaired. Are you trying to make a metaphysical argument about the gun of Theseus?
I've seen some rifling jigs made from all-thread, bolts and an angle iron frame. The trick is just to pull the rifling button through a piece of bored rod. Homemade buttons made from hardened tool steel will do for a production run in the dozens of parts. Carbide is only needed for actual commercial production runs.
Where does a 3-D plastic filament printer figure in because it’s not possible to make a barrel with plastic when the pressure climbs to many tens of thousands of PSI in a proper barrel. Even a half million dollar metal printing machine isn’t going to make a barrel that’s reasonable, it would require post maching operations and the examples I’ve seen barely have velocity, accuracy, or hold up more than a few hundred shots tops while taking thousands of dollars in material costs. By far the hardest part to make and still have a reasonable weapon is the barrel and you just argued against any cnc machine bill much less a plastic one.
And then there are home made EDM machines.
maybe for some parts but the rifling is helical and I’ve yet to see wire under tension that holds a helical shape.
Obviously, they do not. This is completely impossible to do. Nobody can identify "gun components" from a g-code stream that is playing in real-time while the printing happens. That is just not how CNC (large or small) works.
The problem is the serial number is printed on the receiver which is just a block that holds the all important properly made barrel without which you aren’t going to have almost any accuracy or velocity both of which actually separate it from a crude barely functioning weapon and an accurate and powerful one. Putting the serial number on the barrel and regulating that makes far more sense, you can’t even rifle the barrel properly without specialized equipment that’s not run of the mill CNC. You can’t make decent ones on even a half million dollar metal printer and you certainly can’t make them from pla on a $150 machine. Did the barrel wear out on your gun? Well good news there isn’t a limit on the number of guns you can own just buy a new barrel, its not some kind of unsolvable gun of Systheus riddle.
This smacks of butt hurt over people being able to print and repair things they own without having to be at the whims of companies looking to control what you do with what you own on your own time and with your own money.
Given the small scale plans that AI is already able to make, I really donâ(TM)t thing itâ(TM)ll be long before it can choose an architecture that works, make a document describing that architecture, then follow step by step instructions to build it. At the moment it breaks down small problems into immediately actionable steps, and does them. It wonâ(TM)t be long before itâ(TM)s able to do that recursively and then iterate what the best design is. It also wonâ(TM)t be long before itâ(TM)s better at it than software engineers. We typically focus on one area, thinking about the general effects on the rest of the system only. An AI will be able to make detailed plans that consider all the interactions with the rest of the system.
Someday in the distant future it may even be able to bring full Unicode support to slashdot!
The New Yorker Asks: Can Sam Altman Be Trusted? "No." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
So this might be the prick that pops the AI bubble?
I doubt they used a single new technology or device to find this airman. There is satellite and AWACS coverage. Iran downed one but 2/3-3/4 of our AWACS are there.
Of course, but on the flip side they are always given “cool new gear” to try out. Even if the satellite showed where they were, if they were unconscious in a 10’ radius somewhere under stuff it’s not inconceivable they used a new widget to help with the final inches. The reality is these stories are just psyops to embellish capabilities and to distract from real life limitations.
"Take that, you hostile sons-of-bitches!" -- James Coburn, in the finale of _The_President's_Analyst_