Doesn't matter how. Multiple felonies were commited. Intentionaly or negligently. I want to see personal and corporate consequences. If "the AI did it" is an excuse the "justice system" has received it's final death blow in the ongoing oiligarch war against corporate responsibility. It's so perfect for this outcome it would be believable that this was intentional to provoke this exact outcome.

So you still don't get it, or your "point" was so poorly described that it's not possible to understand what you mean. Bravo.

California get a lot more than just those things "simply through geography". It's not clear what your point is. The united states as a whole became a superpower "simply through geography" (i.e. massive river network, massive amounts of natural resources). Most countries are wealthy or not "simply through geography." Is this some unique concept to you? Something you've never reasoned about before? Because it's super obvious to everyone and not some refutation of "not deserving" or whatever you're trying to say here.

Otherwise? It's alreay defined where this moiney would be going: ICE.

That's just as likely to happen as the actual solution to 99.9% of all illegal immigration: cut off the money supply by prosecuting the businesses that hire them. Prosecute them severly with individual consequences for the people involved, both financial and jailtime. But that would severly cut into donations/bribes so instead let's talk about building a wall across the desert to entertain the rubes.

Many H1Bs aren't here because they "want to live here", they are here to get relatively rich (for their home country, typically India) in a relatively short period of time even though they are being paid subpar wages for jobs that could be done by people here (employers love thius because it suppresses ALL wages!). They then return home and open a business or some other thing that is several steps up the economic ladder and would have been unachievable otherwise. Some who do very well stick around and move up the ladder here.

Just my direct experience for a couple of decades working in tech.

If you were worried about being chased by kill bots, go and watch some videos from drone operators in Ukraine. Robots don't need feet for that job.

"Debian is made by humans" makes as much sense as "holes dug by humans with shovels" when you have an excavator on site. AI is a force amplifier, an insanely fast and good one at that. It can not only write software, it can package it, port it, reverse engineer drivers for your favorite hardware and everything else a human might be able to do with a computer, but can't find the time, knowledge or motivation to do. AI is what basically turns all software into Open Source software, since AI isn't stopped by binaries and raw assembler code, unlike most humans.

Refusing to use AI just makes it look like somebody is more concerned with refusing to change their little hobby than the quality of their software.

> Loss of (human) cognitive function through its overuse.

If the whole anti-AI discussion has shown us anything, it's that most humans weren't very good with the whole "cognitive function" thing in the first place. Tons of parroting of long debunked arguments, complete lack of reflection, complete lack of forward thinking (spoiler: AI isn't stuck at ChatGPT3.5 from 2022) and other nonsense.

About the only valid concern against AI for Debian should be copyright, which is still a bit fishy, but since the rest of the industry doesn't seem to care, they might as well just role with it. Everything else just boils down to QA, you obviously shouldn't accept any AI change blindly, but you shouldn't do that with humans made ones either. If somebody spams your bug tracker with low quality AI slop, feel free to block them. Use AI for what it works for right now, and everything where it still fails at, check again in a year or two.

AI is the most powerful software since the invention of software, it's the stuff that was sci-fi just five years ago. Refusing to make is of it just makes people look inept.

what did you say - I was scrolling

I assure you there is an easier way. I hope you're able to figure it out.

None of that is true. Grow up and learn how to understand and rate journalism. Start with Appling the spj code of ethics to media.
" Anyone who defends that is off the deep end self-deluding and in full on denial of reality. "
So you post a factual incorrect statement then call anyone with facts delusional. JFC, take some actual media course. Like, in a class room.

He's incapably of learning. I don't thing he has learned anything since 1980.

OFFS lease stop lying. You wither didn't read it, or didn't understand it.
Some of us remember when he was alive, and read went o to study him.
If you actually know what you were talking about, you would understand the difference between Marxist communism and socialism.

Liars like you have become tiresome.

No, you did not. Yor just making things up becasue you are likely functionally illiterate, can'[t hold complex thought or idea, and have no clue how to admit you are wrong. I pity you, Because your are embarrassingly wrong.

That's actually not true at all. Please tell me how many American FDR called evil? Literally one of the, if not the most socialist president whose social programs led to American become a technological and industrial power house.

American modern conservatives primary planks are to take rights away from marginalized group; which s fucking evil.

Get over yourself and read some books.