Comment Re: Don't store personal data, baby photos on OneD (Score 2) 35
Anything can fail, which is why the whole point of a backup is to have more than one copy in different places.
Anything can fail, which is why the whole point of a backup is to have more than one copy in different places.
We can operate at night, but do we want to? Your comment is precisely why I'm an advocate for permanent DST I'm not a morning person, so fuck any light in the morning. Give me sunlight in the afternoon to sit outside and enjoy myself.
Also no we can't operate perpetually at night, at least not without medical issues. This is one of the reason vitamin D deficiency is a thing.
There is absolutely no reason that work and other mandatory things cannot be done at night, leaving the daytime free for you to do your own things. Wasting what limited daylight hours we have stuck in a cube farm with artificial lights anyway is ridiculous. There are very few jobs that actually require natural light these days.
Further from the equator there is not enough sunlight for that. You'll either be going to work/school in darkness, or coming back in darkness unless you want to severely shorten the duration of the work/school day.
The sun always rises later in the winter, that's the nature of winter... The only thing this changes is the arbitrary numbers that are displayed when the sun is rising.
Instead of fixating around those arbitrary numbers, plan your day around actual environment factors like when the sun rises etc.
The root of the problem is rigidly tying people's daily routines to an arbitrary set of numbers, and then changing those numbers rather than changing the routine.
Assuming that CGNAT makes you immune is a huge error.
Once you compromise a single customer you're now inside the CGNAT pool, where you will see lots of very vulnerable devices because they were left vulnerable on the assumption that they were not reachable. In an ISP with thousands of customers, at least a handful will have some infected devices.
Modern Windows devices absolutely do not become compromised via inbound connections to open ports, they become compromised via vulnerable client software or user error (eg phishing, malware infected downloads etc), all of which only depends on being able to make outbound connections.
You shouldn't be relying on perimeter security anyway, every device should be able to stand on its own in a zero trust scenario.
The russians have been blackmailing ukrainians in ukraine into committing acts against their own government, there are several documented cases of this.
https://www.theguardian.com/wo...
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
https://news.sky.com/story/how...
There have been numerous recently reported cases of russians gaining access to information on ordinary ukrainian citizens, and then blackmailing them to carry out spying or sabogate operations.
You absolutely do have to worry about what hostile foreign governments might do.
There are hundreds of ways an attacker could gain access to the inside interface, even doing so blindly via xsrf where you have predictable legacy addressing.
Many simply don't care.
A lot of ISPs especially in Asia use CGNAT and/or rapidly rotating IPv6 and then do nothing about abuse so the address space is widely blacklisted.
In other countries ISPs aren't forced to use CGNAT, and use at least sticky if not fully static addressing so if customers get themselves blacklisted the ISP generally doesn't need to care as it won't affect other users.
OS/2 must die!