They are "ideological qualified", which is what DEI was always about anyway.

Sounds like psychological projection to me.

I care, and I wasn't "slapped in the face". You care -- were you "slapped in the face"?

Your problem is with "tribal knowledge", not with "face slapping". And tribal knowledge is a universal problem -- at least, that's what the science says. As stupid as MAGA is -- AND IT IS STUPID -- every tribe is equally stupid. If your particular tribe is correct on some issue, it's mostly likely because of lady fortuna.

Alas, thus it is, has been, and always will be.

This is too black and white. Nobody wants the government wasting money. And maybe the government shouldn't be doing some of the things that it does. For example, every state has a dept of education, and the federal dept merely serves as a way to strong-arm states of political issues, like ruining the lives of college men on hearsay because politicized moral panic from epistemologically challenged feminists.

Thankfully the US government is relatively efficient -- as these things go.

And you're factually incorrect as well. Trump cannot "take it all away". Congress has to do that. Trump is an ineffectual blow hard would-be dictator. It seems his only true talents are as a cult leader, and a kleptocrat.

I don't think people wanted Trump to do "terrible things". The American public chose "getting into a car with a drunk driver" over reifying grievance politics. Trump1 was relatively benign compared to the sh*tshow of the last year. Turns out the American public see that they made a mistake.

Harris was a weak candidate. Trump is graded on a curve. The Dems were corrupt. MAGA has created a world where corruption doesn't exist. It's plausible that Hunter Biden got millions to gain access to his dad. Trump's crypto scheme allows billions in corrupt donations with no paper trail. The Dems ran ashore on the ship of grievance politics. And now we're being punished for our sins. The punishment is, of course, way out of proportion to the crime.

This is all true -- for some loose definition of "Nazi". Oh how I wish more people knew what National Socialism was about. For fscks sake.

The left is a rather large coalition. The centrist part of it is fine. That's where I am. The branding belongs to the grievance industry, which is why Trump won. Talk about throwing away a winning hand. Mind you, the GOP threw themselves under the bus by sticking with Trump. It'll just take them another 2-4 years for many to realize it.

The problem of racism in "America First" is real. It's woke politics applied to stupid white people. The woke right is a problem. Woke is a problem. Woke is racist. I don't know what the race hustlers expected to happen.

You make a good point; however, some people really do believe in state's rights.

Oh sure, we can also say that Israel "banana'd" in Gaza too, if we change the meaning of the word banana. So sure Israel committed genocide, for some definition of the word genocide.

Oh really, I thought it was the part where China annex part of India in a war that India tried hard to avoid.

Tibet, Sinkiang, Korea, Nepal, Bhutan, India, Vietnam, Philippines, Taiwan. Literally every neighbour hates China except Pakistan and Myanmar. The latter is a crime state.

It's true that many people have self-serving reasons for hating LLMs.

About 1 million Americans have lost their job this year, with AI being a cited by employers.

I am certainly going to try getting ChatGPT to read and understand legal contracts before going to speak to a lawyer. The more I know, the better questions I can ask. I use a privately staged LLM to posed medical questions. Better than running the gauntlet of Canada's broken medical system. Yes I read articles from NIH. LLMs aren't a replacement for expertise. But these are concrete examples where LLMs threaten jobs while making ordinary people's lives better.

Job losses are a real concern, and people are right to be worried/concerned, even if economic change is good in the long run.

I'm more concerned by the cruddy quality. Ask it questions about the existence of God, and ChatGPT will say it has no opinion, and is NOT agnostic. Mmm, sure thing. Something is true/not true/cannot be talked about, if powerful people will get angry over what ChatGPT will say about it. Apparently there's as many people employed to "manage the message" as there are building the underlying useful technology. I find this pathetic.

The technology is amazing. It is a game changer. It'll be exploited by scammers. It has huge problems. It'll take time for society to adjust.

"We need money for roads and schools" is sometimes about paying for generous entitlements to previous employees.