Seriously, are you using IE or something? Yeesh... You think the ad is browser specific? You really are dumb.
Of course, in this case, you just jumped to an incorrect conclusion. And proving again that you are dumb, the original poster corrected himself/herself within a minute of the original post. You see that one modded +5? Yeah, that one... idiot.
Thanks. Now I remember why I (a few 5-star comments) have quit posting here. Too many dysfunctional assholes here to rip into you.
Oh shit, why do I bother? Anyhow, here's your explanation, anonymous pile of feces: You can't get AB+(or any ad blocker the last time I checked) for IE, so yes, the ad, in this case, IS browser-specific.
Now, you may return to pulling wings off of flies and spying on your sister in the bathroom...
Re "they feel the need to try to profit of it. Utter douchebags", that's the way the interwebs works without putting a quarter in first, Charlie. Site traffic = $$$, and I don't have a problem with that. Stealing content is one thing, posting an article with links to the original is good for everyone. Of course, in this case, you just jumped to an incorrect conclusion.
Seriously, are you using IE or something? Yeesh...
Fact: I'm paying 10% more (roughly) in income taxes now than i was three years ago, with no rise in income. President's fault!
That is the standard you've set, right? The President's in office, stuff like higher taxes are his fault?
What an asshole art thou.
The reason is obvious: Microsoft wants these Nokia patents in the hands of patent trolls to cause trouble.
Steve BLAMMER: All of the evil deviousness of Bill gates, but without the brains.
Do you suffer painful elimination? -- Don Knuth, "Structured Programming with Gotos"