Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
Compare cell phone plans using Wirefly's innovative plan comparison tool ×

Comment Re:We have these (Score 1) 160

Office doesn't annotate well enough for law.

I think you need to be more specific than "the law". Our lawyers frequently use Microsoft Word for redlining contracts, works great. Sharepoint Document Libraries actually work really well for storing these. There are certainly lots of other systems that work as well, or better (ie Enterprise File Sync and Share Applications like Box, Syncplicity, etc).

Comment Re:Stop with the hysteria (Score 1) 188

Plus, cops get paid well, have great benefits and get to retire at 45, so excuse me if I don't break out my tiny violin. Oh yeah, and being a cop is a safer job than driving a beer truck, being a garbage man or a school janitor. We canonize cops way too much in this country.

Really? I guess it depends on where, because there's cops that only make $30k USD/year and have to buy everything from their uniforms and weapons to the fuel for their patrol cars. That still happens today. I knew cops back in the early 00's who made $18k/year(median wage $42k). Yep very well paying. Keep in mind that the median US wage is just under $50k these days. Never met a cop that retired at 45 who also didn't have 25 years of service in already either, they're also so rare that I can count the number of them on one hand. And again it depends on where you work doesn't it on "safe." If you're a long haul trucker you're pretty safe. If you pull stuff into the inner city shithole you're more likely to be shot, hijacked and so on. Same with police, if you're out in the country or patrolling the suburbs you're not at a high of a risk as compared to the guys working in the city. But you might have also missed that being a cop is still in the top 15 most dangerous jobs you can work at.

Also keep in mind that in the vast majority of those cases in those other 14 top jobs when someone dies? It's directly related to the job itself, usually mechanical failure, worksite related, and so on. Being a cop is one of the few jobs where direct interaction with the public is proportional to your chance of being killed.

I also like some of those "most dangerous" job listings. Lots of management in there, which isn't surprising. One of my first jobs was an apprentice at a auto garage. A first line manager(aka the person that deals with the people) was nearly crushed because he walked under a car which was being lowered.

Comment Re:Consistency (Score 1) 188

First time they refused that as well, trying to claim he's an immigrant to the US(tip to people who go lulz he is!). He's a born citizen of the UK and maintains a permanent residence there. The second time, they refused to respond and he's sent a second letter stating that he'll take it up with the commissioners office if they refuse. Which could get interesting, since they can slap fines against twitter in the million range.

Comment Re:Feminist/SJW Echo Chamber Circling The Bowl (Score 1) 200

No, they state without proof that things happened. That's not showing the proof.

So you're now saying that those people linked didn't engage in harassment according to twitters own rules, or what you claimed was harassment by another individual(milo) for doing exactly the same thing? Might want to take those blinders off.

You've lost me. Chat logs of which incident are you referring to?

The ones you couldn't be bothered to read, or check in the linked stories. Maybe a few more will help.

Comment Re:Feminist/SJW Echo Chamber Circling The Bowl (Score 1) 200

Or you're missing context, when someone is currently the target of a harassment campaign they're given a little more leeway than someone who tweets something out of the blue.

And even if there was a double standard (which I don't concede) your comment is still wrong, the alt-right would still be free to say whatever it wants, it would just be that only one side would be able to harass.

Apparently that was easy to disprove, as one can see what happens when you turn around and post exactly what someone else has said, but just happen to have the right connections inside twitter. Notice a similarity here? No? How about when facebook turned around and started removing groups for various imaginary thought-crimes. Starting to see a trend with social media now?

Again context, Jones was trying to retaliate and protect herself from a campaign initiated by Milo.

Context: She was doing it before Milo was involved. Read the story, click on the other links in the story.

I'm not familiar with all of those cases, certainly not the rape threats, and Twitter may have been inconsistent in the past. If so, they will hopefully fix that in the future. No one should be the target of harassment.

You mean like their "trust and safety council" which has done nothing? Or all of the past cases which they generally just sweep under the rug, unless it gets plenty of media attention.

But you're also conflating harassment with with social campaigns, like trying to excerpt pressure against shady businesses, or outing people who have done something bad (these campaigns are very troubling, but different from harassment).

For instance I don't think I'd mind as much if Milo had encouraged his followers to call the producer or studio to complain about the movie. The problem is that he was making Twitter into a place where a black actress couldn't really stay.

No, he wasn't doing anything of the sort. Then again, I suppose if you engage in the right kind of racism it's perfectly fine right? Just like it's okay with the right kind of sexism. See julie bindel, jessica valenti and so on, along with the lovely #killallmen stuff.

Comment Re:Feminist/SJW Echo Chamber Circling The Bowl (Score 1) 200

Hypothetically that could be true. But the credibility of the sources is so poor that it's hard to call them verifiable. If you want to show facts, you need some evidence they exist. Or you know random blog posts and archives of fake tweets. Either's good.

Well since those posts all show their proof of what happened, it sure does explain why you refuse to look at it and ignore facts when you're faced with them. Go on, I'll wait. Tell everyone how those people didn't actually sic their followers on people, and how those stories fabricated their own tweets which are linked. Go on and tell people how those chat logs are faked too, when the people named in there say that they're true. But apparently those are fake too right?

Comment Re:Oh boy. Another scam. (Score 1) 70

Can't dispute anything he's said, has to break down into insults. How a-typical. I remember playing with and against him in Quake, he was a jerk. But even at that, the shit that the US did was so far outside of what should have been allowed that anyone with a functioning brain should be on his side. Funny though, how he wants his extradition hearing televised and the US government is going nonononononono we can't let that happen. Sure does say a hell of a lot about the state of affairs doesn't it?

Comment Re:Feminist/SJW Echo Chamber Circling The Bowl (Score 1) 200

Ah I see, you're just going to make up stuff because while I'll accept actual facts ...

Funny, there's actual facts in all those little links I posted. Strange that you don't find them to be the "right kind of facts" for you though. Which of course says a hell of a lot about what you'd believe, that being the only facts that fits your ideology and agenda are the type you'd accept.

It'd kinda like that stuff with Gamergate. You'll wholly believe the wikipedia article is accurate, but when proven how each section you quoted is factually inaccurate you ignore it, try to move the goal posts, or simply run away. When shown that the people who claimed "gamergate is harassing them" are shown to be the actual harassers, you ignore it or run away. Perhaps you should just save everyone the trouble and move to a country that still has an operating politburo.

Comment Re:Feminist/SJW Echo Chamber Circling The Bowl (Score 1) 200

Tell you what. You dispute those facts, which have pretty little pictures, and links(either directly or archived links) which prove what's in the articles to start with.

But anyone who's looked at the articles can already tell what'll happen. They disprove your point, you can't offer any proof contrary to what's being said. And you refuse to look at a countering point of view because it would hurt the narrative you've been holding onto for the last two years. That social justice and many of them that claim they're "part of that movement" are just plain terrible people who are only in it to make themselves feel good. And in the very worst cases, they do everything that they accuse those they're attacking of doing.

Comment Re:Feminist/SJW Echo Chamber Circling The Bowl (Score 1) 200

No he didn't fake a tweet. Rather he tweeted something he believed to be true from another twitter user who had faked it. That guardian article, like usual is full of factual inaccuracies.

There's a fundamental difference between the two, but I'm glad that you like always ignore the rest. After all, can't let that narrative you've clung onto for two years be disproven in your mind. And those people you've been defending really were and are just plain shitty people who were unworthy of your white-knighting and were engaging in the exact thing that they claimed gamergate did. Never mind 2 years on, that there continues to be no proof of anyone in gamergate having done anything. But it continues to come out that the "non-existent anti-ggers" as you've put it in the past, really were out there doing it. Fun reminder: In that heatst article, Ian is one of the people in those logs and had a change of heart after realizing he had become that which he claimed he was fighting against.

Comment Re:Feminist/SJW Echo Chamber Circling The Bowl (Score 1) 200

Dude, you never did reply to my other post a few weeks ago that disproved all your other bullshit. Then again, kathleen cross(Quinnae) is in those know, Sarkeesian's right-hand at the time. But it's always so good when you trot out the "I don't like the facts, they show the side I have a vested interest in doing bad shit!"

Comment Re:Feminist/SJW Echo Chamber Circling The Bowl (Score 5, Informative) 200

No one is stopping you from spewing whatever inane stupidy passes for incitement commentary among your crowd. You'll be just as free to make an idiot of yourself on Twitter once these changes are in effect.

Really? You should pay more attention, because that's exactly what's happening. This is just one case of many, where there is one set of rules for one group of people and another for the "right kind of people."

Keep in mind that Milo never did that, but Leslie Jones sure did. So have several other people who were verified including a rapper, reporter, and a EiC of a magazine ...all of whom sic'd their followers on other people for engaging in wrong think. There's also another case of a person threatening a reporter with rape...for weeks(wish I could remember her name but it escapes me atm). Those are just off the top of my head. You know what the difference between them and Milo is? Milo doesn't carry the same political ideology as them. That reporter? She's a conservative. But in both cases when there are actual threats against them? Twitter has done nothing.

Disagree all you want, but when you cross into harassment then GTFO. No one is under any obligation to stand there while you abuse them.

Sure thing. Let me know when they actually start going after the actual harassers okay? You know people like Zoe Quinn, Kathleen Cross, Randy Harper, Izzy Galvez, Chris Kluwe and so on. You know, the people who claim that they're against harassment...right out there...harassing people, doxing people, and so on.

Slashdot Top Deals

An algorithm must be seen to be believed. -- D.E. Knuth