Comment Re: Will the screen fold back flat? (Score 1) 59
Can I run Homebrew on that? What about Linux, Windows and macOS VMs?
Can I run Homebrew on that? What about Linux, Windows and macOS VMs?
Thatâ(TM)s not true: they have a matte option.
I'm just so sick of being lied to
You know the old saying: believe half of what you read, none of what you hear, and the opposite of what you see on the internet.
Wrong: macOS can be installed without an email address or phone number.
Oh, AI will stay with us. After all, people use it to make porn - a sure indicator of a technology's success.
But I expect the current bubble to pop before it is adopted with more reasonable expectations. (Both of its capabilities and of its profitability.)
I'm daydreaming about the data center I'm going to buy at firesale prices after the bubble bursts.
I'll sell the computers for boat anchors, and use the building and the cooling system to create a year-round indoor ski resort.
Maybe part of it is being relatively poor for such a large country [...],but there has to be more to it than that
Ex-superpower that can't afford it's lifestyle. Like the US will be in a few years if we don't sweep the idiots out of power.
... you insensitive clod!
And it works just as good, if not better, than the fully up-to-date Office 365 on my work Mac.
Your error is on this line:
104,544,000 square feet / (5280 feet / mile) = 19,800 square miles
You need to square the denominator so that you're dividing by the number of square feet in a square mile. 104,544,000/5280^2 = 3.75
An acre is 1/640th of a square mile, so 2,400 acres/640 = 3.75 sq miles.
An acre is defined as the area of one chain by one furlong (66 by 660 feet), which is equal to 10 sq chains. There are 80 chains in a mile, or 6,400 sq chains, hence dividing by 640.
God, I love these old units. They make me feel so feudal!
I am reminded of some source code for a company-specific program that I saw in the late 1990s. I don't remember why I was perusing it, as I was in IT and absolutely not a developer. But I remember being tickled at one of the comments before a block of code. It was something like, "I have no idea why or how the following code works. But every time someone tries to change it, everything breaks, so please don't touch it."
What a funny thing to say about something that is literally all text. Match up the code itself with the commit message and the ticket that caused it to happen - we work in the most documented business there is.
If you don't force/write good commit messages then you get what you deserve.
If you don't force/use good issue tracking then you get what you deserve.
In general, AI now composes my commit messages. Then I delete 2/3 of it. Sometimes I'll touch it up a bit. So it is helping our process...
For every line of code in our repo I know who wrote it, when they wrote it, what they said about writing it, and why they started to write it in the first place. If you don't know those things then you (or your organization) are doing it wrong.
True, but their production is linked. Maybe, as drinkypoo suggests, that's the idea: artificial "demand"/synergies.
OTOH, wikipedia suggests that warhead plutonium pits are far richer than is typically used for power generation, making it a rather wasteful end use. Seems like it would be best to repurify the existing high-purity material to create replacement pits.
They want to give it to private industry, yet NASA has issues getting enough for its missions, and somehow the war hawks also want to make more nuclear weapons. These do not seem to be mutually coherent goals... (subsidizing the power industry, providing NASA with adequate resources, and potentially restarting the nuclear arms race)
You are out of your mind with this false equivalency.
For some people's beliefs and values, whataboutism is all they've got to offer.
Well, that and projecting.
...there can be no public or private virtue unless the foundation of action is the practice of truth. - George Jacob Holyoake