Each AI company defines tokens somewhat differently, so it's not possible to compare costs-per-token between the different companies' products.
Perhaps how tokens are used in "calculations".
Not how tokens are generated from input.
We do the same in the upper atmosphere tracking GPS signals with special satellites designed to measure delays or frequency shifts depending on gas composition.
All correct, but you are mixing up consumer prices - 20 cents per kWh - with industrial or large customer prices.
Which are in the 5 cent range, or in Germany 8 EURO cents (mostly including grid costs).
Max power is used during take off, then you cruise.
The plane is a prototype. New batteries are just waiting to be installed.
Not only that, you only need a naval captain license (plus the relevant training), but not an airline pilot license.
yes, they did. check the european union withdrawal act.
Exactly. You should check that
Basically everything between EU and UK: is exactly the same as before the BREXIT.
If you insist on CPU,
I don't.
Just do not have the budget to get a new high end Laptop
This model is designed for >= 24GB GPUs.
I did not talk (or did not want to) about a specific model.
Thanx for your knowledge.
Thank you
I was in Geek mode
Good, then we agree
I did not say: "it is okay".
But the tool did not ask for permission what "wget" calls it should/could make.
It was a voice controlled gemini/meta AI tool on the phone: "make me an appointment".
If your backend accepts nonsense calls, it is the responsible of the developers.
There is absolutely no liability to a user who talks into a voice agent: make me an appointment.
You can download from F-Droid. Or actually, download from a web site, and use the file explorer to install it from the downloads folder.
Worst case you have to activate "developer options" somewhere.
It does exist, and taustin made one,
No he did not.
And no: there is nothing like an ad hominem attack . I is simply called an 'ad hominem', and that is a fallacy, and not an attack.
And "wording" is not aimed at the person you are talking to.
And ad hominem goes like this:
Trumpster: "we have to make America great again" (actually not a bad idea, but he does not achieve it)
Angelo: who would follow (vote for) an convicted rapist? Let me make America great again!
The "ad hominem" (it is literally in the name of the fallacy) is: I discredit the person - and I am right with my point - but do not address not what he said.
Ad hominem(s) usually do not happen in talks were two people exchange arguments, they happen when you talk about someone else, who's points you like to weaken.
It is true everywhere in the world.
And when you are using another channel, the radio would drop automatically back to 16 if the coastguard calls it with its MMSI number.
But well, they have the Champaign already iced to toast on the rescuers and survivours (and probably can loot the wreckage as a bonus).
Ad hominem attack. Your answer is to attack other people who challenge you. Got it.
An insult is not an ad hominem. He did not attack you. He insulted you. Slight but important difference.
For example for an insult you might be able to sue him, for an ad hominem, not.
I suggest to google it
grep me no patterns and I'll tell you no lines.
