Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:President Trump (tm) (Score 5, Informative) 524

She won more votes, votes of equal more men, men whose votes ARE EQUAL under the constitution, she's the President elect of the United States. Trump is hoping to be the President elect of the electoral college.

Are you trying to be oxymoronic? You simply cannot quote the parts of the constitution and ignore the specific parts pertaining to the election of the president to claim someone who failed those parts is the legit elected. Furthermore, you are basing this stupidity on the preamble to the constitution which describes the purpose for which is laid out within the constitution that you are actively ignoring.

Do they not teach simple civics and government in high school any more?

Electoral College should not try to overrule the will of the people, and Trump cannot be President with so many conflicts of interests, thats a violation of Constitutionâ(TM)s emoluments clause. You can't have a Trump Brand USA (tm)

The electoral college was specifically set in place to allow "states" to elect the president of the united "states" instead of the people. The federal government has a president of the United States not the United "People". The congress and senate is the people's house and originally the senate represented the states (which is still does to a certain extent even after the constitution was amended to allow direct elections of the senators). The house of representatives was supposed to represent the people which is why all laws implementing taxes are supposed to originate there. The senate represented the states and the president is and was a figurehead to enact the sovereignty given up by the states. You have to remember, after the revolution, the thirteen colonies became 13 countries which eventually joined a confederation which ended up forming a constitutional republic that ceded only portions of their sovereignty. This is the entire purpose of the 9th and 10th amendments and article 1 section 8 that defines the original powers of the federal government.

I don't know if you actually understand this and are simply trying to convince the ignorant to be useful idiots or if you seriously never bothered reading past the preamble and skipped school during your civics classes or something. Either way, this isn't hard to find out which you probably should have already done if you actually care about the issue as much as your post pretends to. It is not like this isn't the first time that a president has won the electoral college but not the popular vote in your life time if you are actually old enough to vote. God help us if you actually claim to be educated higher than a high school level too.

Comment Re:The other campaign (Score 1) 445

lol.. That tripe is stretching it a bit. That is unless you think blowing your nose in the presence of someone who doesn't look just like yourself is bigoted or something. In that case, you are clearly stupid or blinded by some brainwashing of some sorts.

Lets examine this huff post thing a little closer. The first thing they present is the Kahn incident. Who cares, the man used his dead son to politically attack trump and trump commented on the fact that his wife was silent during the entire stench of it. It is somewhat amazing that you would think that it is racist in some way to comment on how a party that claims to be about the rights of women and minorities puts a sharia Muslim who activly oppresses women on stage to make the case that Trump is racist when Trump points that out. Here, watch this and ask yourself why people are laughing. Then go find out more about how Muslims treat women. Hell, they just arrested a female British journalist in UAE for reporting herself being raped to the police. They say she admitted to participating in extramarital sex.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The rest is pure tripe from the all blackness have to leave to questioning Obama's natural born citizenship. That does not make someone a racist. The Jewish star over money which I have never heard of and probable neither had trump until someone contrived it to make the claim doesn't make him racist and neither does telling a group of self identified jews that he doesn't want their money because he doesn't want to be controlled. He had said that to most all groups donating to him.

I find it fascinating how much bending of reality needs to happen to maintain this Trump is a racist world view.

Just because there are women on his staff doesn't mean he is not misogynistic.

You are correct. but it does mean that he doesn't use that to discriminate in employment practices.

Well maybe you think about it saying it, but the rest of us never do, because we are not rude and crude.

More people than you realize think about saying it. In fact, I was at a bar just the other night and saw this absolutely gorgeous woman who was way above my league walk through and thought that if I could hit that, I would knock the bottom out of it so hard that she wouldn't ever forget my name. My friend who was right beside me said something to the same effect just before ordering another drink and resuming a game of pool.

That is exactly what people in power thought about Hitler at the time. They tought he could be controlled and would never rise to so much power. All the crazy people start somewhere rising up. Remember Hitler was voted democratically.

Wrong.. I don't know if you are trying to reinvent history yourself or if you are being a useful idiot but no one thought they were going to control Hitler. He pushed himself into power by using violence and threats. He actually told the nazis to put him in the party leadership or he was leaving the party, so they did. He used violence and cunning to being a plurality in the Reichstag which propelled him further. He ran against the Treaty of Versailles and was championed by the people for violating it. The people around him gave him power because they knew he would give them more power. And for those who lived, it was true until the end of WWII. But Hitler was never elected the president of Germany, he lost the only election for president he ran for to the incumbent president Paul von Hindenburg who then appointed Hitler as Chancellor- a position he eventually ended up turning into a supreme dictatorship leading to his reign of power and WWII.

History does not support your worldview in this. Google is your friend if you are afraid to get a paper cut opening a book or something.

Comment Re: Why bother... (Score 1) 140

Size and slow networking. Remember, a lot of files were shared on dial up connections. Outside of technical implementations for specific purposes, the vast majority of people's exposure to MP3 was through the use of Napster and such. This is what made it popular and with all those files in the wild there would remain a need to at least play them back.

By late 1900s, I'm assuming you meant 98-99 or later when computers commonly had storage larger than a gig or two and 1.5 meg or faster internet speeds were becoming common (although still expensive) in larger cities. I remember upgrading from a 14.4 modem to a 33.6 and bragging about the speed increases on a local BBS with an internet gateway (which eventually became one of the largest dial up services in my area). My first CDROM was larger than my hard drive (640 meg). We were trading MP3s back then- although they were mostly lectures and crap and not music which Napster popularized the format with.

Comment Re:Yes! (Score 2) 412

Nah.. It's relatively easy to get elected to a representative seat if you aren't from one of the big states and loony in what you want. On average there are about 710,000 people in each district. If you convinve only a third of them to give you $5, you have over a million dollars to run your campaign with.

It's easier if you are part of one of the two big parties and not going for a highly contested seat but the same level of fund raising can make you one of those who pays for their election campaign if you are not up to the task of running yourself. Take that same average of 710,000 in a congressional district and divide it by 8, if one eight of those people gave you $10 to push your message, it's over $800,000 to help someone else get elected.

Now, if you actually have a gripe worth caring about, something you really think needs influencing and other agree, you can relatively easily come up with enough money and power to influence your local representative.

BTW, I have met my US representative several times and even debated him on concerns in discussions we have had. You have to convince him that your idea is as important as you think it is in a way he can also convince someone else of it's importance. It's really easy to do (at least where I live), just call up their local office and make an appointment. You will have to wait until he/she comes back from Washington but that is a regular thing (at least where I live). I also see my representatives, both for state and US government out in the community quite often too. I don't always get to talk with them, and often when I do, it is just a hello or glad to see you out type thing. They are often with their families doing family stuff. You might have seen yours out and about too. Some people don't even know what they look like because those type of seats do not normally use the expensive TV adds and many people just toss those mailers away during election season.

Comment Re:Yes! (Score 1) 412

Or you stop giving the President so much power and make him a limited check and balance on government as the constitution originally intended.

You have a lot more control over your senator and even more over your representative when you compete with votes within a single state and even portions of that single state than you do when you compete with votes in 49 other states and the district of Columbia (Yes, Washington D.C. has electoral votes).

Comment Re:Clinton (Score 1) 412

Have you actually read the authorization to use force?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

That's it in a nut shell. Nowhere does it state that Iraq was behind 9/11. It does state that some terrorist involved were known to be in Iraq as well as others who were against the US and that due to 9/11, the threat of terrorist getting WMDs that Iraq was believed to still be in possession of and working on was a direct threat to the United States.

Here is the full version in PDF

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/...

This entire Iraq was behind 9/11 is just a rumor from people with short attention spans who are too lazy to pay attention to detains. Bush did go around and say 9/11 changes everything and the threat Iraq imposed needed to be taken seriously but he wasn't saying Iraq was behind 9/11

Comment Re:The other campaign (Score 1) 445

I've seen nothing from him that he is racist. At most, he is a bit misogynistic but not in any ways that actually matter as his campaign manager was a woman and he has women in leadership roles within his companies.

Trump is rude and crude at times, and has said a lot of things most people think about but never actually say publicly but that doesn't make him racist. The best you might be able to come up with is that racist groups supported him but if we go off of guilt by association when it is all them wanting to associate with you, you could call every single politician a racist terrorist.

As for Trump being crazy, I'm more comfortable with a president that all parties in congress will be comfortable throwing under the bus and backing up several times to make sure the job is done than Hillary who would be protected from such impeachment and eventually get her way with some things.

You could say that I didn't vote for Trump as much as I voted against Hillary and actually wanted that vote to defeat Hillary. Trump is controllable, Congress can go around him. It will force bipartisanship and cooperation and that will likely benefit the country more than either of the two winning or losing could ever hope to change with a law.

Comment Re:Don't pardons require a conviction? (Score 1) 445

No. A pardon implies guilt but doesn't require a conviction. President Ford gave Nixon a pardon with no convictions- not even an impeachment.

Immunity is the essential effect of a pardon without a conviction but there are no strings attached which could be in an immunity deal.

Comment Re:Why do we care? (Score 1) 45

lol.. The cloud is little more than hosted services outside the premise. There is no high horse or anything involved. It is about risks and mitigation just like the loaded handgun. If you don't want it going off unintentionally, don't leave it where it can. The same with malware, why even have it on your network unless you want it there?

Comment Re:The other campaign (Score 1) 445

I voted for Trump over Hillary but I would have voted for Jim Webb without any reservations.

The problem is that the democratic party is not what it was when he first joined- it is not the same party of FDR or JFK or even Jimmy Carter (who sucked as a president BTW) anymore. That is why Jim Webb was shut out- he is stuck in the past with the great men of the democratic party and American history. That has no place in the modern democratic party unless it can be used as a sound bite somehow to push something that isn't already obviously in similar fame.

Comment Re:Why do we care? (Score 1) 45

Yes, why have a loaded handgun at a preschool and leave it laying on the table next to all the toys?

People are inherently stupid. Even the ones who think they are smart tend to be stupid in at least several ways. If it is there, someone will execute it eventually. I used to have a small script that would ping a certain IP address every time it was executed. The firewall for the system at this address would alert me every time it was pinged from inside the network. It was a simple .bat file and I would name it things like "do.not.open.pdf.bat" or "click.this.and.computer.crashes.bat". At least one a year someone would try to open it and I would know more on which workstations I needed to lock down strictly and which ones I could leave the use with some freedom. Every system had it on it, but only few- usually disgruntled employees- would venture into the inner workings and open it.

But more interesting would be how it got there in the first place. Was it just part of a backup of a previous infection already dealt with? If so, if the need to restore that data could restore the infection. Has somebody hacked the cloud account and is using it to host the files for when some down loader Trojan on another system get pwned? Or if there an insider working to set up the right time to infest the company and sneak away with lots of valuable data like customer lists, proprietary secrets and so on just before they leave and start their own company? Or is it dead man switch payload for a semi- disgruntled employee to activate several days after he doesn't log into a specific machine?

If all those are satisfactorily answered, then sure, what is the harm. If not, I would assuming answering them and more I didn't think of would be the harm.

Comment Re:Republican Would Benefit? (Score 1) 304

Outside of it came from them and not me pushing this stuff or not everyone is doing it, where is the problem exactly?

Seriously, where is the problem? They cannot continually add to legislation in order to stifle government because that would require a majority vote and someone to ignore the rules when the leaders close the bills. The majority can simply vote down amendments and request a final vote.

Now if you are suggesting that the amount of time to read the bill and make objections known or summon support from the citizens (for or against) who have access to read the bills too is the problem, then I suggest you define democracy and republic for us so we all know we are talking about the same things. At best, any real argument that can be made about this or similar rules is that some are afraid of the people knowing before it is too late to do anything about it. That in and of itself isn't all that bad in every situation but those situations tend to be limited to government knowing what best and going against the popular sentiments of the people. I think deep down, this is likely where the problem is.

Comment Re:Neat that it's possible, but insignificant (Score 1) 181

Have you ever heard of comtil? The largest source in most places is sewage treatment. But yes, there are problems with sewage treatment and it is often tackled already at a large expense.

I'm not sure the bio-crude would suffer any ill issues with those contaminates though. Part of the crude refining process already removes or separates contamination by default. It basically removes the portions it wants and then the sludge left over gets reduced to make asphalt tars as well as petroleum coke. There are already acceptable heavy metal allowances in the delayed coker process which I doubt the amount in sewage would impact considering the volume in question.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Comment Price and Standards (Score 1) 207

If you'll recall, good HDTVs were over $10,000 while 4K sets can be obtained for under $2,000. Also, many of the cheaper original HDTVs offered HD only over VGA or Component cabling, and then only in 4:3 aspect on CRTs without an anamorphic setting so everything was taller and thinner than it should be.

Slashdot Top Deals

A man is known by the company he organizes. -- Ambrose Bierce

Working...