Clever click-bait advertising:
One of the things an Apple Mac can do that Windows 10 machines can't do -- at least easily and completely legally -- is run both Windows and MacOS. Interestingly, it's Apple's Boot Camp utility that makes this feat possible, which essentially enables Macs of all flavors to boot directly to Windows 10 and use the Mac as if it were a Windows machine. Usually, this is a fairly straightforward process that works well, with the resulting Boot Camp configuration doing fairly well at mimicking a Windows 10 machine with a few hardware limitations. As of the 2016 MacBook Pro machines,
And the Bait after the Advert
it appears that Boot Camp might be causing some serious and uncharacteristic audio issues. It appears that the new speakers running on the refreshed MacBook Pro line aren't working so well with the obsolete drivers provided in the current version of MacOS Sierra Boot Camp. Users are reporting the issue on all models of the 2016 MacBook Pro, and they are not experiencing the issue in MacOS. Virtual machines using Parallels or other software are also not experiencing the issue, providing more support of a bad audio driver causing the problem in Boot Camp.
Fortunately this tally is only indicative of the Internet-savvy demographic. Not everyone believes everything they read on the Internet is true.
The real world systems like the Electoral college keep one demographic from declaring what the laws will be for everybody.
He's put together an argument that is much more sound than your dismissal as a conspiracy theory masqueraded as sarcasm.
Do you have any credible hypothesis to the contrary of his suggestion?
I swear you sit in the same pod as I do...
Yep. Quite recently.
Me: Can you confirm this one?
Friend: Yes, though its been fixed. They pushed out a firmware update that reset the systems.
Was that so hard?
Confirm any 'news' you read with a trusted friend in the area.
I live near Portland and recently seen the following article, and asked a long time friend it's true:
When I hear back, I will know if it's trustworthy or not.
And checked by an editor. ffs they can't even be bothered to use spell check.
Well Sanders won the popular vote, but not the GOP's version of the Electoral ( Super-delegates ) . If you want to count by Popular vote then Hillary *still* wouldn't be there.
As for looking at the election machines now? The evidence has been damaged or tainted by this point. It wouldn't stand up in court.
Good for you. If you're happy I am happy.
What I was referring to in my post was defining a search for opposing the rising minority power over the majority in regards to a very small segment of the Human condition.
As one example:
Creating an environment for abuse by perverts trying to get carpet permission to enter restrooms of the opposing gender for their own gratification.
Also, how to keep kids from exposure to age-inappropriate concepts, leading to premature or inappropriate life choices.
When entire communities are forced to endure perverts using any excuse they can to go into the restroom of the opposing gender when there are 'family restrooms' available for decades is not the definition of 'affects very few people'.
I agree I could have used a lot more words to soften the tone but some of these people have short attention spans so I kept it brief.
You had mail, but the super-user read it, and deleted it!