Comment "We're looking for what's verifiable." (Score 1) 49
That works for science. But for biographies? What makes a biography "verifiable"? The longer someone has been dead the harder it is to verify any claims. Ultimately you're relying on historians or whomever wrote the history books and more often than not they've been wildly biased in favor of the viewpoint of the historian. It's not supposed to be that way, but it is.
I can point to several "sources" for George Washington chopping down a cherry tree and not lying about it. Doesn't make it "true".
Jesus? Mohammed?
Likewise, it's going to be difficult to find legit sources for some historical claims. (and that doesn't even get into Wikipedia's arbitrary judgements on what makes a source reliable)
At the end of the day Wikipedia is just following human tradition - "When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."