It's still voting with our wallets. By removing our eyeballs, ChatGPT loses more impressions of advertisements to sell. It is a big deal to them.

Traffic Cams are being installed everywhere in the USA

No, you've just articulated why this tool will actually not be used as a legal solution to anyone's copyright problems.

Lots of people use similar musical constructs in their songs and nobody gets the copyright for any of it. For example, Lean on Me is a C scale. Not everyone who writes a song that walks up and down the C scale, nor even the same portions of it as are used in that song, has copied from Lean on Me. But this is what we are going to get from an AI that detects these kinds of similarities. It will not be able to tell anyone that they copied it specifically from them. More trash, move on.

The term ultra-processed foods is one of those "I'll know it when I see it" definitions so far. Until they can actually define what that term means and use that as a meaningful way to identify foods that have common characteristics that may be bad or good under what circumstances, then anything someone says about his dangerous they are is full of shit because there is no category.

they will be liable for 'errors' because of their guarantee policy. they don't want to deal with it, and I don't blame them. but this rule can't stand for long. once the market is full of only automated agents, they will be missing a market opportunity that others are taking advantage of so I see this as a temporary legal reprieve for ebay.

they aren't criminalizing anything. they are establishing a category of tort (a legal liability for which you can be sued by private entites) and establishing the initial boundary in law. this is a common practice.

this actually helps protect musk because it puts the tort on the user who actually does the thing instead of the company that makes the bot. you are grossly misunderstanding the issue.

Rather than blaming the tool maker for what people do with it, expose the offenders themselves (the person who makes and uses the image, not the person who makes the program that made it possible to make the image) to legal tort. Problem will eventually be solved.

Credit card companies will have to write down their outstanding debt. Even if not in full. It will blow a hole in balance sheets, cause a panic on wall street. contagion is a risk.

If everyone thinks it's their 'right' not to have to pay back the fees they have racked up, banks will have to write down all the consumer credit debt. Just watch.

I agree.

I've actually been tracking this! In 2016, it cost me $40, with tax and tip, door to door for 1 large pepperoni + 1 extra large cheese + cheese bread from papa johns. In 2020 it was $49, in 2023 it was $53, and in 2026, last night, the same order cost me $67. (I tip 20% the entire time.)

the bots have trouble now for sure, but look back 5 years and tell me you thought any of this was possible back then.

Writing Software: which if you aren't familiar can do pretty much everything knowledge related and produce any ditigal artifact. Still more: software can generate control instructions for physical media - like a fork lift - just as easily as it can crank out a PDF, and we have Language models that can already generate the code for that. So think bigger.