Honey, I'm done responding to you. I linked you right to the article (not 'a few tweets') that outlines, very clearly that Uber. Partnered. With. An escort service. The press release came right out of Uber's Lyons offices. And you've twice now missed the part where I said that I don't believe that in and of itself constitutes misogyny, but that it's the writer's right to publish that opinion.
And you can't possibly see how a reporter could lead a conversation that way? You think that it's impossible to manipulate dialogue? How much money do you have, I'll be willing to bet that during a conversation over a few drinks I can get you say all kinds of incriminating things and use them to portray you as a bad person. Shockingly I don't even have to know much about you to do so, and the "reporter" knows more about the executive than is needed just based on the company he works for. Yeah, I know.. hard to imagine that attacking someone's livelihood would be enough to incite a response, but it happens pretty often. *hopefully the sarcasm is obvious*
Saying something is possible is not the same as saying its unlikely. The situation you posited is so extremely unlikely that rational people would not even give it thought. Hence, my diagnosis that you have Feminist Derangement Syndrome.
Oh, how the picture becomes very clear now. When the questions hurt attack the person asking questions.
You've now twice demonstrated to me personally (and three times in this thread) that you have no reading comprehension. With that as evidence, I conclude that your lack of reading comprehension is no longer just my opinion, it's a fact. See how that works?