Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:More BS (Score 1) 35

It is guaranteed Musk was involved in negotiating the agreement. Nothing gets done at the company without his approval.

The 42 cents should be enough to tell that he was involved because of his edgelord fascination with 420, but in that same vein, I'm more surprised it wasn't 69 cents.

Submission + - Trump: 'It's no longer free speech.' (politico.com) 1

sysrammer writes: The president doubled down on his claims that critical media coverage of him is "illegal." ...
President Donald Trump on Friday reiterated his claim that critical television coverage of him is “illegal” and pushed back on criticisms that his administration was taking actions that chill free speech.
“When 97 percent of the stories are bad about a person, it’s no longer free speech,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, complaining about an apparent asymmetry between his victory in the 2024 election and his treatment by media organizations. It was not immediately clear what statistics or laws he was referencing.

Comment Re:WOKE movies are SHIT. WOKE Netflix SHIT (Score 2, Insightful) 77

They want to trans your kids.

I know that what I'm about to say is a bit overused by a lot of people, but this is, quite possibly, the dumbest thing that I've ever read. Both in concept/idea and in execution. Everything you said is obviously stupid, but this... this is just so idiotic that I'm struggling to move past it.

Comment Re:And (Score 1) 20

I'll anecdotally second this.

If it's not an Apple Watch, I see quite a few Garmins (including my own).

I had a few different Pebble's back in the day and they were awesome... so I'm naturally in on the preorder. The 30 day battery life (even if it somehow turned out to just be 20 days) is a HUGE draw for me, in addition to the simplicity. Battery life is a huge reason I have a Garmin. Two weeks on a charge? Yes please.

Comment Re:Las Vegas is feeing people to death like an $50 (Score 1) 104

While the fee itself is overall dumb, it wasn't a fee for just "unplugging a cord". It was a fee for unplugging a very specific cord to the equipment that monitors the for-purchase, in-room snacks/accessories (like a minibar fridge but not a fridge). That piece of equipment uses pressure-sensitive triggers to charge guests for items that are removed, so if it's unplugged, presumably, it wouldn't accurately monitor those things or know what to charge for.

Yes, still, the fee is absurd for what it is, but those people would have been totally find if they had unplugged the lamp instead of that thing.

And that hotel should absolutely do a better job of either making that fee known or hiding/securing that plug (but why would they bother to do that when they can make $50 every time someone mistakenly unplugs it).

Comment Re:U.S. Mobile (Score 1) 24

I just switched both of our lines from T-Mobile to US Mobile - and so far, so good. Got a promo that was basically 2 unlimited lines (1 "premium" and 1 "starter") for 1 year for $390. Yes, we paid for the full year up front - but it works out to just a hair over $16/mo. total. We were paying $144/mo. with T-Mobile. Outrageous - even with all of the "perks" that T-Mobile offered.

Comment Re:well (Score 3, Informative) 152

For all practical purposes, until our actual voting system changes, voting 3rd party is probably the worst option. The math essentially makes a third party vote one for the person you like the least.

I've always liked this video on FPTP (first past the post) voting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (especially at about the 5 min mark and the "spoiler effect")
And then some additional detail on the "alternative vote": https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Not that the AV is necessarily the "right" answer - but FPTP isn't it. People in the US are obviously free to vote for whichever candidate they choose, but our system will basically never allow a third party candidate any kind of reasonable chance to win without a drastic overhaul.

Comment Re:I can vouch for this (Score 1) 42

The first couple of weeks were tough... not gonna lie. I missed updates from friends, funny little cat videos, etc.

I haven't completely deactivated mine as I have a club page that I occasionally need to admin on - but I've stopped using it for myself for at least the past 18 months or so. The thing was that I wasn't missing "updates" from friends or family or anything - because almost no one actually posts updates about themselves or what's going on in their lives anymore (at least not in my circles).

Almost everything I was seeing was just sharing of generic memes and stories from the alphabet soup of "funny" Facebook pages. I don't need FB to see memes. Or to see anything funny. There was just no value in anything in my feed anymore. Just that and the ever-increasing number of ads, "do you know these people" blocks, irrelevant stories, suggestions, etc. So why bother? All of that on top of the things you mention like mental health, tech bros, and so on.

Comment Re:Did my employer sponsor this article? (Score 2) 44

In a round-about way, you're not completely wrong. Many of those "best company for _____ of YEAR" awards are based on self-nominations from the companies. You'd have to read the details of some particular award, but for a lot of them, your company is doing the legwork of applying based on whatever criteria the award has defined. Doesn't mean they haven't earned it or are evil because of it or anything... but it also doesn't always mean they were hand-picked out of the blue by some external entity because of how awesome they are.

Slashdot Top Deals

Trap full -- please empty.

Working...