Trump is the first third party candidate to win an election.
I hadn't thought of it that way but it's truer than most would admit
Sadly, there's some truth to that. That's how the Ds managed to lose after the Rs handed them a gimmee.
Of course, that's after the Rs who absolutely didn't want trump managed to run the most unelectable dregs of the party against him.
That is the icon of the democratic party on the banner for this story. While Trump has been known to have held both sides of most matters lately, I have yet to see him call himself a democrat - and he most certainly did not have their endorsement to run for president.
"In many cases, I probably identify more as Democrat," Trump told CNN's Wolf Blitzer in a 2004 interview. "It just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats than the Republicans. Now, it shouldn't be that way. But if you go back, I mean it just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats.
I think he doesn't really have any basic idealogical underlings beyond what makes him money and keeps him in the public eye. I would not be surprised if he pisses off both parties equally. Depending on how that is done it can be good or bad.
Less H1-b fraud/abuse, more regular employment for those that want it, and a climate where anyone can succeed - not just those that identify correctly.
Even if one opposes him, one should be hoping for success.
If he can deliver that, great. I want him to succeed so the country succeeds, even if I didn't want him as president. I am concerned that he has promised a whole lot of stuff he can't deliver one. To start, his claims to bring back manufacturing to the US and punish those who import from abroad. Nice campaign pitch but a very tough reality. When it doesn't happen he'll blame everyone but himself, it'll be interesting to see what happens when many of his supporters decide they have been sold a bill of goods. He's already backed down from his build a wall claim by saying it'll be build now, pay later.
As a European (from Finland, and a Hitchensian socialist and anti-theist), I've felt the policies of secretary of state Clinton on my daily life, and am convinced she's a warmonger. I haven't gotten that vibe from Trump. If anything, he won't meddle in middle eastern conflicts trying to change governments, and seems in good terms with the greatest nuclear power after the USA. So in terms of nuclear war, or regional wars, I think we'll be better off.
Again, I'm saying this as someone who's not a US citizen, nor do I share the American culture or history in any way. I'm looking out for the interests of my family and me, and am glad Hillary isn't president.
I don't think it is so much as that he is not a war monger but that he doesn't care about geo politics except how they impact him. Russia annexing the Crimea and going after the Ukraine? No problem, Putin likes me and says nice things about me; so what if he wants to take back land he thinks is his? If he can do it it just shows how powerful he is.
My real concern is this seeming ability to rationalize any failure on his part as the result of devious actions of someone else and thus not his fault, as well as his need to always be the "best," even hen facts dictate otherwise. An unwillingness to listen to, or tolerate, dissent is vey dangerous in a political leader. We'll see how he takes being shown up or when someone says no to his face.
Work more, get poorer.
Exactly. This is just the cellphone division trying to palm off their own failure to use proper tolerances on to someone else.
OTOH, it beats the devices being too explody!
I've never been a Star Trek fan, it's an ok (collection of) series and I enjoyed most of the movies but it never really grabbed me to the point where I'd make sure to watch every episode. But for some reason I really got into Enterprise. Until the time travel story line, yes.
I also like Enterprise, especially for its "stuff isn't quite ready for space travel" and the Vulcan's "we have to help the poor earthlings and not let them hurt themselves as they venture out" approach. The time travel story line jumped the shark; and the alternate universe one, "In a Mirror, Darkly," involving the Tholian Web and some real promise. A ST:Empire with the Klingons as good guys had a lot of potential.
It's time to face up to it, most people don't see copyright infringement as being all that serious. That includes the big copyright advocates that get caught with infringing material on their websites or who never quite get around to paying the artists their royalties, or who claim copyright on things that expired years ago. Right down to agencies who collect "for" artists who never agreed to their representation and who never see a check for the amount collected.
Meanwhile, it can't be THAT big of a problem. The various media companies make more money every year.
Sorry, a Dr. Who reference. Davros, the creator of the Daleks.
So, decisions/involvement/circumstances for the parents and household when the student is ten years old ultimately impact if that student, eight years later, will have the prerequisites to compete at an elite college. Poor parents, single parents, parents that end up with stressors that prevent them from committing the time and attention to their child's upbringing will, on average, harm that child's educational performance and will lead to reduced opportunities simply because the student does not have the academic basis in order to attend these schools.
Excellant points. Parental involvement and understanding of the college entrance "game" will always be a big factor in who applies and who gets in, and that probably correlates better with income than say a students potential to succeed in college. Applying to college can be daunting, and if you don't have a parent who has been through the process and have a school that is geared to getting kids in college it will be much more difficult. Add in the perception that "college is so expensive that we can't afford it" even though many schools will provide enough financial aid to make it affordable and you have a double whammy, plus if you don't see many kids going to college from your neighborhood you may not even have expectations of going to college.
You hit the nail on the head when you said the challenge is reaching these kids early in the educational process; but that takes money we as a nation seem unwilling to invest.
Wasn't there something about a PASCAL programmer knowing the value of everything and the Wirth of nothing?