Comment Long Before the Web (Score 1) 382
Five decades ago (way before the WWW), there were two secretaries in the company I worked for who were so sheltered and innocent that they couldn't understand why they kept having customers call to ask for a manager to complain about their "language." The reason for customer complaints? Their names were Frances Screws and Susie Bangs, which they clearly stated when answering the phone for their bosses. They were married, respectively, to Dick Screws and Hardrick Bangs. This was the Bible Belt, and my simply using the word "darn" would shock them (they considered it to be profanity); both would frown and blush. I did worse, however; they didn't like me a lot. Apparently, their husbands were equally sheltered and naive. I met both of the husbands once, only briefly, at a "holiday" party, but I didn't disagree with that characterization by others who knew them better. I thought the situation was of little real consequence, a little more than funny, but apparently (I learned after I had left) it caused both couples quite a bit of trouble in the real (Bible belt) world trying to do mundane things like making restaurant and motel reservations. I was told they had to get notarized, certified copies of their birth and marriage certificates in order to open bank accounts (and for one of them, a BankAmericard credit card account, which ultimately they were denied). My secretary explained to me that she had tried to explain to Susie what the verb "to bang" meant so she would know why folks she talked to were so offended, but first she had to explain what the verb "to fuck" meant and what "intercourse" was; Susie had never heard the first, but knew of the second, but wanted to call sex with her husband "marital relations." She simply failed to accept that the verb "to bang" could possibly mean what was claimed. So incredibly sheltered. About 20 years ago someone all of us had worked with back then told me both couples ended up legally changing their names (but that had happened in the late 80s, long before the web). While I would have much more sympathy today, I did convince upper management to allow them to use an "incorrect" name when answering the phone. Frances didn't want to do that because she considered it to be telling a lie, but someone or something eventually made her come around.
I've met a half dozen or so people in my travels whose last names were either Screws or Bangs (or something else once considered "suggestive"). They appear to enjoy hearing about Frances and Susie, but each of them had their own stories to tell.
Submission + - SPAM: Learning to Program is Getting Harder
Submission + - FCC Approves New ATSC 3.0 TV Standard (reuters.com)
ATSC3.0 will apparently make personal data collection and targeted ads possible. New TVs will be necessary, and broadcasters will need to transmit both ATSC 2 (the current standard) and 3 for 5 years before turning off the older system. For now, the conversion is voluntary. There appears to be no requirement (as there was when ATSC 2 came out) for low-cost adapter boxes to make older TVs work; once a channel goes ATSC 3-only, your current TV will not display it any more.
Submission + - So whatever happened to that spaceport SpaceX was building in South Texas? (blastingnews.com)
Submission + - What Lies Beneath: The First Transatlantic Communications Cables (hackaday.com)
Submission + - Server Snafu Makes Microsoft Beg for CA Audit Data from Its Partners (softpedia.com)
According to a message on the CA/BForum, there was an error on the server that was running a CRM application that managed this list of trusted certificates and the adjacent details regarding each certificate and CA. The data is lost forever, and Microsoft is now asking CAs to resend their most recent audits. Currently a lot of certs are broken in Edge and IE.
Submission + - Why DevOps is So Painful for Big Companies
Submission + - Comodo Antivirus Tech Support Feature Lets Anyone Connect to Your PC (softpedia.com)
Submission + - Carbon Dioxide From the Air Converted Into Methanol (gizmag.com)
Submission + - Where Are The Raspberry Pi Zeros? (i-programmer.info)
It also has one big advantage over similarly priced alternatives — a community and a track record. There are so many Pis out there that it has a stability that any IoT developer will find reassuring. Thus when the Pi Zero at $5 was announced it was a knockout blow for many of its competitors.Suddenly other previously attractive devices simply looked less interesting. The $9 C.H.I.P, the $20 CodeBug and even the free BBC MicroBit lost some of their shine and potential users.
But the Pi Zero sold out.
The Pi Zero was supposed to be available from November 26, 2015. It is now the start of February and all of the stockists, including the Pi Swag Shop, are still showing out of stock. That's two whole months, and counting, of restricted supply which is more than an initial hiccup.
Of course you would expect enough to be made available initially to meet the expected demand.
The Pi sells something in the region of 200,000 per month so what do you think the initial run of the Pi Zero actually was?
The answer is 20,000 units. Of which 10,000 were stuck to the cover of MagPi and "given away" leaving just 10,000 in the usual distribution channels. And yet Eben Upton, founder of the Raspberry Pi Foundation, commented:
"You'd think we'd be used to it by now, but we're always amazed by the level of interest in new Raspberry Pi products,"
Well yes, you really would think that they might be used to it by now and perhaps even prepared for it.
At the time of writing the Pi Zero is still out of stock and when it is briefly in stock customers are limited to one unit.
A victim of its own success, yes, but the real victims are the Raspberry Pi's competitors.
Submission + - Elon Musk cancels blogger's Tesla order after he complains about launch event
Submission + - Microsoft Edge's InPrivate Browsing Mode Isn't Private- At All (betanews.com) 1
Submission + - IRS: Identity Theft Protection A Tax Deductible Benefit - Even Without A Breach (wordpress.com)
The announcement comes only four months after an earlier earlier announcement (https://eforerisa.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/earlier-announcement.pdf) by the IRS that it would treat identity theft protection offered to employees or customers in the wake of a data breach as a non-taxable event. Comments to the IRS following the earlier decision suggested that many businesses view a data breach as “inevitable” rather than as a remote risk.
The truth of that statement was made clear to the IRS itself, which had to provide identity theft protection earlier this year in response to a hack of its online database of past-filed returns and other filed documents which ultimately affected over 300,000 taxpayers. (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/18/us/politics/hacking-of-tax-returns-more-extensive-than-first-reported-irs-says.html)
The new IRS guidance could be a boon to providers of identity protection services such as Experian and Lifelock, though maybe not as much as one would expect. Data from Experian suggests that consumer adoption rates for identity theft protection services is low. Fewer than 10% of those potentially affected by a breach opt for free identity protection services when they are offered. For very large breaches that number is even lower — in the single digit percentages. (https://securityledger.com/2015/05/amid-rampant-data-theft-consumers-left-breached-and-burned-out/)
Submission + - North Carolina town talks back (newsobserver.com)
But news of the Northampton County hamlet’s moratorium on solar farms blew up on social media over the weekend after a local paper quoted a resident complaining to the Town Council that solar farms would take away sunshine from nearby vegetation. Another resident warned that solar panels would suck up energy from the sun.
As outlandish as those claims seem, town officials say the Internet got it wrong.