-The report found Trump's campaign welcomed and received help, then obstructed justice. Hardly a hoax.
Had they found that, they would have charged someone for it. Not one charge for electoral fraud, campaign finance violations, treason, or other related crimes was charged against anybody. The DOJ position about not charging a sitting president does not apply to anyone under the president (except, perhaps the VP?).
The "potential obstruction" stuff is such a joke that only a comedian can address it. Again, if it were real obstruction, they certainly could have charged out any underlings that were complicit, but they didn't do that, because there was none.
If there indeed was a case to be made, why did they need to fabricate evidence to obtain a FISA warrant? Why did they need to employ Halper and Downer to generate an appearance of impropriety?
Even the honest lefties like Matt Taibbi, Chris Hedges, Aaron Maté, Jimmy Dore, and others will admit it was all a hoax. It wouldn't be the first time in this generation that the media has teamed up with the intelligence community to defrauf the public (Iraq WMDs).
-George Floyd had fentanyl and meth in his system, making an overdose from respiratory depression exceedingly unlikely. In law, there's something called the Eggshell Skull Rule; that a healthier person would not have died from what you did is not an accepted defense to murder.
George Floyd had an extra-lethal amount of fentanyl, particularly when combined with co-intoxicants. Meth is not an antidote for fentanyl, no matter what you try to tell yourself to justify mass looting and mob beatings/murders.
He was claiming he couldn't breath before they got him on the ground (all suspects claim that now, to try to weasel out of arrests). He was diagnosed by the police with excited delirium. He needed to be restrained, for his own safety. He was alive when the paramedics took him away. He died of heart failure, due to pre-existing conditions with contributions from the drugs. He admitted, on video, to "hooping" (hiding drugs up his ass when the police came). Neck trauma does not cause heart failure.
Watch the full video.
-Not familiar enough to say. Sure is a shame police have entirely destroyed their credibility to such an extent the first presumption is a bad shoot.
Get familiar.
-There absolutely was a quid pro quo, as established by the transcript and many witnesses.
Every witness was directly asked if they could testify that Trump comitted a crime. Every single one said no. Vindman, Sondland, Yovanovich, Kent, not one could name any action that seemed impeachable while under oath. And, of course, Ciaramella's testimony was kept hidden, because it blew up the whole charade.
-Doesn't effect the outcome even if the "falsified" information is excluded.
Evidence collected with a warrant that was based on falsified information is legally inadmissable. But, that aside, if they had such a strong case, why would they need to falisfy evidence? Why was the FISA rejected multiple times, until they added the Steele dossier? It was even rejected once with the dossier, if I remember correctly, which is why they set up the circular corroboration scheme with Yahoo News.
-All but the most salacious claims have been verified, and those stand at lack of evidence rather than disproven.
You read too much fake news. Cohen was never in Prague. The FBI decided the primary subsource was in no position to have any information, and that Steele lied about what he claimed anyway. It was all bunk.
-And of the many, many actual Russian contacts, like the Republican-led Senate just found Manafort had?
Manafort had many contacts in Russia and Ukraine, due to his work for both Democrats and Republicans, in large part while working with Tony Podesta. So what? Carter Page had Russian contacts because he was an informant for the CIA, which the FBI later covered up to get their warrant. George Papadopoulos had no Russian contacts, but Stefan Halper, George Mifsud, and Alexander Downer worked very hard to make it look like he did.
-Targeting individuals for suspected crimes is not targeting "the campaign". You don't gain immunity from all laws during your time working on a political campaign.
Targeting individuals because of their connection to a campaign, despite no evidence of any crime, is serious malfeasance. Carter Page was a CIA informant and they tried to paint him as a Russian asset so they could use a 2-hop FISA warrant against the entire campaign.
And, despite the FISA spying, despite Mueller's subpoena power including access to Trump's taxes, despite years of the entire media being on the case, and despite being in the public eye for decades... nobody can prove any crime. That makes Trump the most investigated, and cleanest, man in the history of the world.
-The weight of the medical evidence suggests this is a false statement.
The dean of public health at Yale would say otherwise. I am in science myself, but a different field, and the data is quite clear. I had been getting reports direct from Italian doctors early on about this, before Trump suggested it could be effective and the derangement made you all deadset against it.
Who cares what they say? They are mostly anti-Trump, just markedly less so than CNN and MSNBC. The GOP establishment hates Trump for being an outsider, just like the media overlords that have programmed all the NPCs.
