The website can NEVER be more convenient than not going to the website after Google gives you the answer without going there. No website can and it's why Google should not be allowed to do its little summary games. There is no way to do them fairly.

You can get a full sized convection oven. You can also power a medium sized one from 110v@15A. When I was a teen we moved into a mobile with a lousy oven and my mother bought a DeLonghi countertop convection oven that plugged into a regular outlet. It cooked about as rapidly as any normal oven, and had capacity between one and a modern air fryer. Just enough for a turkey basically.

What does it do when the content is dominated by ads served by Google?

So the picture I'm getting is that the anti rsilvergun trolls are paid Russians. Weird.

Conservatives love to cancel while crying about being cancelled because every accusation is a confession with them.

"Congratulations, you just coded an unplayable lagfest. This has been tried, this has failed"

This is nonsense.

You don't have to detect cheating before it happens. You can detect it slightly after the fact and then retcon scores and ban players. This is almost as good, much easier, and doesn't create any latency.

For one thing we can shit directly on China-paid trolls like yourself

"President Trump's closure of the de minimis customs loophole in May"

NEVER HAPPENED.

I buy stuff from AliExpress all the time and I'm not seeing these big promised tariffs on my small orders.

That was not the argument.

When you can maintain a train of thought long enough to have a meaningful one, come on back and I'll make it obvious you're clueless without having to feel bad about it.

What he said was:

I look forwards to the posts where because Apple is not an absolute monopoly they are somehow immune to any accusations of anti-trust.

A person who can read and understand English can understand that he didn't say that they had an absolute monopoly, but was anticipating stupid arguments about it not being antitrust if they don't have one. You are not that person, apparently, but you are a person whose knee would jerk and result in a defense of Apple's actions.

It's easy if you know ahead of time. If you're some poor fucker who got tricked into a "free" iPhone and then you bought some apps and shit and got your data into the iCloud and then you find out that Apple's anticompetitive* actions are impacting you, now there is an actual financial cost to changing. In a world where the vast majority of people are living paycheck to paycheck, it is not easy and no one should have to listen to your privileged assertions in defense of Apple's illegal acts.

* Fucking Mozilla didn't put this word into the Firefox dictionary, I wonder why not? Probably sucking off Google. I know we're talking about Apple here but holy shit there's a lot of sleazy shit going around. Ironically if you google "define anticompetitive" you get a nice big fat definition from Oxford languages so that you don't have to visit their site, which is itself an example of anticompetitive behavior.

I've already discussed this with you as much as I'm going to, since you are confused about every point. But I will address this:

That's the opposite of what you said last time, so please do fuck off forever.

They weren't. Now they slavishly repeat conservative talking points. Occasionally a liberal article gets through... Then there is a termination.

Are you serious? Besides being seriously cowardly

Whether HDR is real or not depends on both brightness and color depth. Many TVs will take 10 bit input but have an 8 bit panel and simply aren't capable of displaying subtle gradations. Then they do fake HDR. This can still make improvements (they can do better dithering, my LG43UT8000 actually does get noticeably better in so called HDR+ mode, which is really fake HDR) but they still don't have more dynamic range.

Hey idiot

Read before replying

Thanks