Who needs research when the Department of Cleanest Pollution will guarantee your safety?
Slight correction, they guarantee a safe tee. You know, golf is one of the few things that comes ahead of ruling a nation with an iron thumb.
Neither of those. Extend the metaphor: "Using a coding co-pilot is kind of like giving a coffee pot to a smart six-year-old Can they do it? Possibly. Could they fail? Definitely. Therefore, they require supervision. Constant. Supervision. And *constructive* feedback. Why do you think parenting, teaching, and training is so hard?
The real question is how good is your insurance when your child suffers third degree burns over 70% of their body and is the final cost worth it?
No, you've mixed it up. The inconvenient truth is that we can't meaningfully reduce fossil fuels without incentivizing the change economically. And that is such a hard thing to do that politicians don't even discuss how to get started.
This is why tariffs on solar panels brought by both parties over the last two decades make no sense. If you actually want to preserve the environment, because it’s in national security interests as well as fucking common sense, then solar panels should be so cheap homeless people use perfectly good ones to sleep under because cardboard is too valuable. Domestic production was less than 1% at the time and now it’s about 1.8% with no possibility of actually competing because the vastly higher costs of domestic production make adoption financially unviable, meanwhile China is on goal to actually be renewable with almost twice the solar installed in may as the entire US last year because it’s cheap power. Instead of adding taxes to stop adoption, a trade war with no price floor would have been amazing and exactly what the world needed flooding the world with nearly free panels. China provided this and the money to keep domestic production afloat would have been trivial compared to the value of all that free power generation capacity, but the American people were taxed into not being able to take advantage so it’s the reverse of what you claim. The financial path was there but the American people were screwed out of cheaper energy by established interests looking to profit at the expense of everyone else.
I can see it now, "I had my air in my back pocket, now its shaped like a boomerang"
Does it come back to your hand if you drop it?
Whatever model, I just used the web browser version. You do point out an interesting quirk, sometimes the same prompt will yield different answers; not sure if that is a result of model differences.
Nothing says reliable like non-deterministic output.
that ship sailed, crashed, burned and sank a long time ago
But the planks, oakum, and rigging keep getting replaced by the masses as it’s sinking and burning, so is it really the same ship?
since 99% of the takers or those vouchers are people that were already sending their kids to private schools.
Also a way to circumvent separation of church and state.
So it accomplishes nothing, and actually worsens what it tries to prevent.
Its like those state sponsored road side signs that were popular about 20 years ago that said “Keep your eyes on the road”. Sigh..
And that may be one of the things that young people may know intuitively: Do not use LLM for calculations and do not use them as fact databases. Both the information about the density and the calculation and comparison are not strength of language models.
Given an error rate of 50%, and an inability to reason even the most basic things like simple addition or comparing two numbers and returning which is larger or smaller, they can’t be used for any informative purposes whatsoever. The only thing llm are fit for is taking an existing document template example, and filling it in with ever so slightly different information. Even then it requires a human to proof read. Things like coding are straight out the window, completely useless unless you already know how to do and fix everything, it that case it might speed you up slightly if it’s massive blunders don’t waste more time than it saves.
I like work; it fascinates me; I can sit and look at it for hours.