Comment Re:Wrong question. (Score 1) 61
we are talking about people who are, busily and intentionally, building 'AI' products against the public.
Why on gods soon to not be green earth would you cater to them when you could enslave them instead?
we are talking about people who are, busily and intentionally, building 'AI' products against the public.
Why on gods soon to not be green earth would you cater to them when you could enslave them instead?
I know the median age is fairly high on Slashdot but jfc nobody's heard of DALL-E in years, get with the times grandpa!
They need to clean up their act!
Apparently they have a habit of stealing images and using their size to bully the photographers into silence.
Didn’t various models just steal Getty images for training data and were too big for Getty to anything about it? Even if they legit sold them access this is funny. But not as funny as distilling the models for next to nothing and making them open source, because that’s hilarious. Reduce, reuse, recycle!
Totally unique to the business schools. Absolutely none of that behavior among English majors or engineering undergrads. Anywhere. Ever. Born 40, all of them.
When I was in grad school we had a business development course where business school majors teamed up with engineering graduate students to form teams that solved real world business technology problems (for free). It met in the business school, and on the first day I showed up early and guessed which school students were in with 100% accuracy as they walked in. It was easy.
The general expectation in industry is that the number of bugs must be finite and, even though every change might introduce new ones, as the AI models find new ones and they get fixed the total number of yet to be be found bugs will come down.
I would just like to remind everyone that this only holds if the number of new bugs introduced per bug fix is less than 1. In the somewhat unlikely and fully incompetent case of more than that, it tends toward infinity.
Just eat a spoonful of potassium, swallow a couple of zinc washers, and chew on a copper wire and you'll be good to go.
Good news then, now that food isn’t being inspected you’ll be doing that whether you want to or not!
If you are a regular pleb, yes. You would be prosecuted to the fullest extent.
If you are a billionaire running a "frontier lab", no.
This^
Ive already heard legal blogs talking about how AI agents can’t have mens rea. An agent can’t purposefully, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently do anything because those simply don’t apply. It’s not even straightforward in the majority of cases to show how they even _can_ commit physical acts. So all crime is now legal for them.
The system worked...why is this a story?
Because according to the source, and plausibly so, ships and aircraft were mobilized and nearly intercepted the ship. It was called off at the last second when the final check(s) showed it false. This is like saying the first response nuclear missile system worked during the Stanislav Petrov (1983), Norwegian Rocket Incident (1995), NORAD Training Tape (1979), and Faulty Computer Chip (1980) events nearly kicking off WWIII but were caught at the last second by a human. I’m not going to have very long to say I told you so when the giant push to remove all humans from everything happens so that last check before the end of the world just doesn’t exist.
Parallel lines never meet, unless you bend one or both of them.