... you are an incompetent moron unwilling to learn how to properly perform basic tasks in the real world.

Perhaps you might consider that they are all constantly lying, and so when you combine the fact that the lie doesn't map to the facts with the realization of who said it, one would be a fool not to believe that they are lying. Of course they are lying. They were trying to psyop the Amercan public by making it look like Iran bombed their own schoolchildren and weren't counting on getting caught by the discovery that a patriot missile was used to do the bombing. You have to be an idiot if you can't figure out what really happened, that they are lying, and why the are lying.

"It wasn't a completely foreseeable consequence of not double checking things."

Your post makes no sense, because you don't know the difference between a subject line and the body. Pro Tip: The body of your post does *not* begin in the subject line, but if you absolutely *must* do something so stupid then put ellipses after the words in the subject line and before the first words in the body.

There is a youtube video by "I Ask AI" where they ask 8 different AIs to pick the worst President in the last 100 years. Trump's Truth Social AI picks Trump, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that AI is much more intelligent than Trump.

" I expected him to stick "Trump" somewhere in the name"

He would have, but "Trump Intelligence" is already reserved and refers to the level of intelligence of an amoeba.

Add to that the consideration that a *lot* of humans can't even figure out that Trump is dangerous and many of those humans will be interacting with AI systems. I can already 100% guarantee that AI is an amplifier of human stupidity, and the question is not "will it be involved in the downfall of humanity", but merely "how long until that happens." People think that in order for AI to "kill us all" they have to do it on their own, or have intent to do so. Just as "guns don't kill people, people kill people" so too can it be said that "AI won't kill humanity. People will kill humanity."

You don't seem to understand that, while it is true that this mistake was caught by humans, there are currently systems with less human interaction and things are moving in the direction of taking humans out of the loop entirely.

"The question is ultimately if you would have been better served with doing your own investigation rather than relying on AI, did you retain the knowledge, and was the information complete/accurate."

no,yes, and mostly, respectively. You are lost in a broken paradigm where you think AI is some kind of assisted search technology. With frontier models you can have intelligent conversations, and they are pretty much always more beneficial than talking to most people. They provide links to sources, but they go far beyond being mere sources of information. I have to assume you have either never used, or never actually learned to properly use, AI.

Clearly those ducks have seen more video footage of Trump from sources other than Fox "News" than a large segment of the voters have.

I guess you didn't get the memo, but Trump explicitly stated that he doesn't think about *you* at all either. As far as "getting things done" you can't possibly be so stupid as to believe that unless you mean "undermines the country and destroys any chance of the country avoiding complete disaster."

Who says the number stickers have to correlate with actual beliefs?

You didn't seem to be smart enough to understand that you have made the mistake of arguing in favor of my point in your attempt to argue against it.

Today I read your comment. If it wasn't proof that being human doesn't make you intelligent then I don't know what is.

OpenAI is quite literally joining Anthropic in the call for caution, so you should probably learn a long overdue lesson: Knowing how to find the Slashdot URL doesn't make you an expert.

You might want to watch the Black Hat presentation and actually educate yourself before trying to tell us "what they did." Hint: You have no idea what you are talking about.