Comment Re:Orly? [Eh? Asking for solution?] (Score 0) 43
I think that Subject was an artifact of a lust to FP. Care to explain? Most obvious candidate was "Only?", but I don't see how to fit it to the context. Maybe you mean that OpenAI should discontinue something else?
But I did have a funny idea. Another simplistic solution approach for the big problems (and of course doomed to fail for that reason among others). I'm a big believer in free speech, but here's a funny idea:
Should there be a tax on the profits from for-profit free speech?
Of course you should be able to say anything you want for free as in "no money involved", but once you start cashing in... And double the tax rate for proven lies. Then triple the rate for AI-generated drivel and hallucinations.
As they ramp up the AI we'll be able to pay off the national debt. No problem, except that all the money will be worthless.
(But my problem is that I think too slowly. Evidence that I'm human, not an AI. By the time I have an actual idea, it's the next day and the Slashdot discussion has already died... Dupes don't count, but I do think a solution approach would be for "good" stories to move more slowly down the top page.)