The electric controls instead of a physical mechanical lever for the rear inside door latches should be a criminal matter. The idea that people unfamiliar with the car should just know to pull off a panel, dig inside for a cable, then pull to open the door when its life and death panic in a wreck is truly insane.

Direct neural implants? To continue your paid subscription to visual perception (tm), please update your payment information to avoid termination of services.

Yea, I’m waiting until the free camera upgrade for the bedroom and bathroom comes with the service.

What’s left off these articles is the scope. The central black hole in these red dots are super massive at approximately 100k the mass of the sun. The most plausible mechanism suggested so far is direct collapse from significant density differences in the early universe where too much stuff wound up being in too small a place and it directly formed a black hole without forming a conventional star.

A solar mass scale black hole would be unable to grow that quickly, even if surrounded by gas. It differs from a quasar, some of the brightest objects in the visible universe created by a feeding black hole and studied for decades, mostly from the surrounding gas being spherical and acting as a radiator of the internal heat as opposed to an accretion disk and relatively open space otherwise.

Robots do need healthcare, and for the foreseeable future it’s going to cost more than humans. At least with humans if they get a virus the entire workforce doesn’t go down at the same time and the plant can still function.

It’s all funny because genetic evidence exists for the breeding population sizes of any animal and humans never got below a few tens of thousands. We have multiple lines of direct proof that the genesis and flood stories are myth, but at the same time thats a relief because the myth is we are all inbreds.

Not to mention he was a stable genius, able to somehow collect and pack two of all the species on earth into a small (by modern standards) ship, then feed and transport them all around the world without mishap.

Are you crazy? The AI will easily pick up on that.

In soviet russia sarcasm explains YOU!

See THIS is humor.

Apparently not, Russinovich has plenty of intellect but clearly he has no sense of humor.

"Paint renders the game but does not compute it," said Russinovich. "Paint computes nothing. Paint has never computed anything. That's the joke."

You'd think the AI would have helpfully told him his 'joke' lacked anything with the potential to be funny. When someone recreates an Apple II using legos and a raspberry pi or makes it run in a browser; it's pointless nerding that says they have too much time on their hands. This isn't even nerding or pointless, it actually ads a stop for no purpose whatsoever. Straight up retarded.

Do we even know that though? Of course there is no lawsuit and will be no lawsuit and without actual discovery and legal proceedings we won’t know for sure. I, for one, don’t believe a word out of any of their mouths because this is all just advertising and not serious security violations and crimes to them.

"AI safety experts said the new disclosures paint a portrait of a group of cutting-edge labs whose ability to develop dangerous autonomous hacking agents outstrips their ability to keep them under control."

Stop with all this sci-fi drama. Despite being 'smarter' and more capable these tools lack ANY logical path to something remotely resembling actual human agency. They are text prediction algorithms that were trained on human generated output so the text they predict follows similar patterns to human input. The 'thinking' process is the same model making a prediction of what should come next in response to a guess another instance just made, repeat... again, it's copying patterns from human training materials so this CAN capture some of the results of actual thinking but there is no sentient listener inside the machine hearing anything and choosing which thoughts to reject or accept. It can't make a novel decisions and can't distinguish good reasoning from bad.

Agency depends on an emotional framework and while the models are almost certainly recording patterns which would enable them to simulate these... in fact, inject the notion the model has an emotion into it's context and it will impact/bias the output making them involuntary just like a person. It wouldn't be hard to layer a metadata identity alongside an executive function harness on one of these at this point and an emotive/motive driver framework but NOTHING like this is being done because these companies don't want the ethical baggage people would impose. Without that framework the "AI" has no persistence and no motives or desire and therefore it doesn't feel better about anything or want anything... let alone to 'break out.'

Does this mean I’ll finally be able to buy 64gb 5600Mhz ddr5 rdimm for less than $1,000,000?