So governments took over, solving those greed related trust issues, and replacing them with political ones.

The political issues are about greed too.

Russia has a GDP roughly equivalent to Italy. They aren't exactly "the largest in the world".

Snowden has deliberately murdered over a hundred informants.

Source? (And no, lack of evidence is not evidence)

1. Crucially, they didn't remove infringing material when put on notice. Instead, they just removed particular specified URLs.

Not all links are infringing, though. For example, imagine that if every time a video on Youtube got a take down notice, Youtube removed all copies of that video. How many official (and therefore non-infringing) videos would get removed?

It would be rather perverse if doing data de-duplication on identical files made someone guilty of contributory copyright infringement, given that the result would be fewer existing copies of the data than otherwise.

I am pretty sure that it isn't really a thing.

All of us anarcho-capitalists beg to differ.

Really. It is just putting together two opposite meaning words

Anarchy is categorized by a lack of rulers\the state. Capitalism is a system whereby the means of production are privately owned. There is no inherent contradiction.

Libertarianism fundamentally believes in government

Other than all those libertarians that don't fundamentally believe in government, you mean.

All anarcho-capitalists are libertarians, but not all libertarians are anarcho-capitalists.

And is there really a "huge difference"? Libertarians want less government. Anarcho-capitalists simply want a little less than that.

But how many births are caused by excessive drinking?

I do agree that the logical end of libertarianism is anarcho-capitalism. That's the old joke:

Q: What the difference between a libertarian and an anarchist?
A: About six months!

The rest of your post amount to "Your views are extreme, therefore they are incorrect", which is simply an appeal to moderation, so I'm not certain exactly what it is I'm supposed to respond with.

"Nuh uh"?

Be mindful of how you use "libertarian". Most libertarians believe in a small government that executes a limited number of duties, including police, courts, and military, and thus your statement is directed towards the wrong group. The group you're looking for is "anarchists".

Be mindful of how you use "privatize". Trading an unaccountable, public monopoly that feeds off the taxpayers for an unaccountable, private monopoly that feeds off the taxpayers is not true privatization.

As an anarchist myself, this is obviously not what we mean when we say we want to privatize police. Once the police are (a) voluntarily funded and (b) no longer given a government-backed monopoly on security services, then you can declare an anarchist nirvana. :)

"Listen, the government gave you a choice between Goldman Sachs and Goldman Sachs in the last election, so you can't complain that Goldman Sachs is raping your future!"

Yes, that follows logically . . .

This may have been true of early pentile displays, but with increased resolution it hasn't been a problem in higher-end devices for quite some time.

1. They are already "increasing the money supply". They simply don't have enough physical bills now to hand out all the digital money they are inventing.
2. A fiat currency controlled by a state apparatus is not a "free market", no matter which direction they end up choosing.

Repeat it all you want. I will still defend your right to do so.

I don't know why you thought I had never considered "people saying mean, untrue things about me" when formulating my position.

My position here is complicated by the fact that I don't believe people should be forced to testify at all. But assuming voluntary testimony, have them enter into a contract beforehand.

No criminal penalties attached to any of those.

The holder of a government clearance has agreed via a voluntarily contract not to reveal certain information that the government wants to keep secret. A regular citizen has no such obligation to keep government secrets, even today.