Comment Re:Guessing (Score 1) 39
It would also probably be less costly than starting a legal fight over license violations.
It would also probably be less costly than starting a legal fight over license violations.
You raise some legitimate points about file format compatibility.
Do you have any particular feelings about Euro-Office or potential license violations? So far you haven't engaged with the summary at all. Otherwise this move would/should be happening anyway. MS and Google can both be a huge pita no matter who is President, and freeing yourself from their grip should be seen as a desirable move no matter where you live.
Just a guess but it seems like the Euro-Office team is keen on violating a license or two, and perhaps they found it easier/simpler to violate the OnlyOffice license.
It's actually not a bad idea. Centralized databases are prone to security breaches. Having your credentials in an encrypted ipfs store somewhere could be more secure if it's only accessible through a token on a blockchain.
That being said, there's no way anyone knows what you've actually put on the ipfs store if the entire contents aren't being exposed during the age check. You could put any old ID you wanted in there.
That or the DoD is paying better than Sora ever would.
Madoff lasted maybe 25 years before his operation collapsed in 2008. Bitcoin has lasted 17. Think it'll make it for another decade?
OpenAI has struggled to drive revenue. Any cash generation on their books is going to be seen as newsworthy. It's probably not enough to cover their expenses, but it may be enough for them to increase their debt exposure or attract more investors.
For now.
No, they can't and won't. Your views do not represent the average American.
No, I'm pretty sure Italian automakers are worse.
Yeah right. Enjoy not selling any cars.
There are a lot of Americans that don't want public transportation and bike routes.
The CCP is disgusting! But make sure to buy their products! Oh and also, why are you singling out American auto manufacturers? The CCP has its sights set on Toyota and VW first . . .
You don't want the infotainment system being handled by the same control module as the engine or safety system/airbags. Realistically-speaking you want maybe three separate control modules. Anything more than that and it's someone either overengineering their cars or using cheap low-performance components featuring legacy chips that can't be relied on to handle multiple subsystems.
I never cheated an honest man, only rascals. They wanted something for nothing. I gave them nothing for something. -- Joseph "Yellow Kid" Weil