too lazy to dig it out for you, but I saw on c2.com Wiki from a /. editor that he watches the recent comments and feels a desire to expose the anonymity since he can tell who is anonymous coward.

Since this is a free software fansite, there is an elevated level of trust, the whole cottage industry of idealism here is about increased trust. That's why everyone loves Google here. Anyway. Just thought it noteworthy that anonymous coward is not anonymous here, contrary to my expectation. I don't blame /. they have a lot of administrivia to do versus trolls.

yawn. will delete later.

noting that a cup of coffee can catch me the wrong way resulting in junk /. posts, I'd rather just use a nym finally (yet again.) all things said read-only for infinite duration, and done in infinite public accessibility. all things said and done.

List of Slashdot comments in fifo order that I agree with or found interesting:

http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=44091&cid=4592270 is the true. Slashdotters lie. Speaking as someone who has been around /. through two re-initializations of the user database.
I see the Slashdot bias is outspoken: http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=234609&cid=19107873 What? is Slashdot playing a game of Risk?
Software patents are different: http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=232799&cid=18929223
Uncensoring: http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=233031&cid=18950361
Problematic Firefox extensions: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=230191&cid=18677553
(infotainment) http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ contains graph.
http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=229273&cid=18583305 It is those who are most anti-Mammon who are the easiest to astroturf.
good writeup: http://slashdot.org/articles/07/03/27/1848230.shtml

No I'm not vain enough to think anyone else will ever gain from this journal entry.