Cursor has a model? Oh yeah, I totally forgot they had one. Literally. Not a joke.

Cursor has already peaked.

Maybe its just the lazy slashdot blurb choosing per usual, but just recounting a single teachers antidotes? Such bullshit. Don't post that crap. Come back when you show a statistical meaningful test decline in both reading and math.

So, ai agent places "prediction" that public figure A is dead, orders product from grocery store with hidden ingredient they are known to be allergic to and delivers to their house. This isn't Asimov, we built the bots without the three rules.

Are you sure? I'm pretty sure Facebook offers that same level of quality content, and advertisers seem fine with it.

Yeah, sanctions are from other countries that we aren't actively supporting in a current war.

I would argue that it can not be good, without facebook somehow knowing how you felt about what you were looking at on line. When you read an article discussing AI, are you doing that because you love AI, you're invested in AI stocks, you hate AI, you use AI in your job, AI took your job, the image with the headline was interesting, or maybe just random click. Thats hard for it to figure out, so it might just send you all the AI things in your feed to see how you respond.

Yes, I was assuming they've been doing this since day 1 of selling advertisement. I'm assuming this is targeted towards advertisers, trying to make them think the ads are better targeted now, thus justifying a price increase.

They made VR a long standing dream of Science fiction into... absolute garbage that not even the people building it wanted to use.
This is a company that makes terrible things for terrible people.

I don't get the hate for him. He posts perfectly fine replies.

Yeah, the EU seems to be the only place where I think there is a reasonable expectation that they'll get slapped.

No, it sounds like Microsoft has made the appropriate bribes in the new regime to avoid being beat up in federal court.

Why would you say it doesn't?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_deities

It might be or it might not, but my god that article sucked. Way too general, and not specific enough. The picture was obviously wrong, If you encrypt an image, it looks like the option on the right produced by perfect randomness. You could not tell the difference between the two. Unless they are using some really dumb encryption method that highly depends on perfect randomness somehow. I'm not aware of what that might be, but no one should use it. Obviously even if this is a source of perfect randomness, you can of course Man in the middle the data and subtly shift it without anyone being able to tell.

Hit dogs holler. You're a redneck, hillbilly Yankee. I have no ill will towards hillbillies or rednecks, they are certainly in my family, but they don't accept me as one of them. I'm from the Yankee branch of the tree.