But current AI mostly works, whereas an alleged philosopher's stone did absolutely diddly squat when observed.

Do you actually believe AI is stuck in its D+ state for say 50 years?

Someday such technology will ubiquitous enough to watch the entire news this way.

(Biden looks eerily like Jen Psaki. Foil hat stuff...)

People make fun of "too many letters", so some propose calling it just "gender liberty" (GL), meaning old fashioned mores about romantic partner and fashion choices related to gender are dropped per regular public settings.

Thus "a GL person" would be equivalent to "an LGBTQ+ person".

Being there is a shortage of women in China due to cultural habits, the Chinese gov't should embrace homosexuality to reduce the chance of riots. People who "get some" tend to be calmer*.

But there has been an anti-LGBTQ+ push by the Chinese gov't in the last few years. Seems some "Archie Bunker" in the brass got triggered by overly fem boy bands.

* There is a theory mid-east violence is caused by polygamy, which leaves many men without mates.

That's what proprietary microcomputer companies believed. But open component standards greatly accelerated competition and options, flattening the proprietary players like Commodore and TRS. (Apple is the lone exception.)

We are at the Model T stage of generative AI. It will get much better, probably either better than CGI, and/or will help create the CGI models themselves which are easier for humans to fine-tune than direct AI output.

However, there will be growing pains. This project is a guinea pig, and is squealing bigly right now. There will be AI roadkill. Gloating about failures may make one feel better, but won't stop the inevitable march of AI progress. The cat is out of the bag.

Even if not a guise but actually true, it's probably a bad idea for a car manufacturer to get into the auto-drive business because they are very different kinds of endeavors. Those who try to be both hardware and bot-software keep choking, including Tesla and Apple. If the top players choke at it, then a second-string like Volvo is more likely to win the lottery while getting struck by lightning while chewing gum on a unicycle than succeed.

Let bot co's build bots and car builders build cars. Instead Volvo should work to form industry standards so that a bot-kit can snapped into a physical car when ready, hedging their bot options.

How was Russian collusion investigation a "hoax" exactly? MAGAs don't seem to know the meaning of the word, just echo their cult hero verbatim.

Dear YouTube Viewers,
 
This is to inform you that we are up Moutholini's ass,
and too far up to change our kiss-up policies,
so please don't ask.
 
Thank You,
-YouTube's OrangeNosed Management

...gave YouTube a deal it couldn't refuse.

And those who spread medical lies should be locked up! Impressionable people can get poisoned or killed.

I evolved a more flexible Prince that makes catchy deals.

My PHBgpt is down right now.

People tend to hire social-economic clones of themselves, and MBAs being relatively social value "buddyness" even more.

Thanks to AI now slashdot will get mashup dupes that are amalgamated parts of articles already submitted. It will be fun the first few times...

Re: AI can't do new, only regurgitate patterns

It only has to be good enough to fool humans, not cure cancer.