I think it's the same article that claimed people like me, autistics, should have been dead by 36 (numbers skewed by young patients getting support sooner). I'm 54

True- though I think smuggling Tabaco for Tabasco and Maple Syrup is a little less horrific than sending in 19 terrorists to take over airplanes to fly into buildings.

The same problem happens at the Southern Border.

Note, it's not Mexicans or Canadians who are the issue (well, other than cartels down south sending Fentynal into both countries).

Borders exist for a reason and need to be militarized.

Be more specific, which point do you disagree with?

I'll admit to being wrong about this and extend it out to the previous 10 Presidents.

Yes, but it would stop them from funding it on increasing demand for grid power, and raising the energy cost of everybody who's getting laid off.

I was responding to the Muslim Migrant comment, what were you responding to?

Unless, of course, they come through some other nation- which is the real problem we're facing on the Canadian and Mexican borders. We've got almost no problem with either Canadians or Mexicans, but since 9-11-2001, we've known that there are people of ill will coming across those borders.

That's been true for at least the last 5 Presidents. Ever since Clinton, Executive Orders have turned Congress into the Clown College of Government.

I want only ONE regulation on AI- and I contend that this regulation would make the current generation of AI completely unprofitable:

Data centers should be restricted to using generated electricity on-site at the datacenter with a goal of zero net carbon energy generation. They should require NO energy from the grid.

That would explain the short attention span and the lack of ability to understand that history is important. Thank you, ArmoredDragon, for explaining to me why this troll has zero memory of past presidents.

You didn't get ad hominem until this one.

You act like Trump is unique. He isn't. He's part of the same corruption that has been going on for at least the last 60 years.

For not wanting to discuss things, you sure reply a lot.

My point is that you can't count on wind for 24x7 coverage of the grid. I don't know why you have a problem with that statement, but it certainly is not based in either meteorology or physics.

I don't participate in ad hominem attacks. The correct way to deal with this is to stick with the original subject- which to me is that this description can fit *every* president in recent memory.

Rule #1 of flame wars- deal with the idea, not the person.