Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Pointless (Score 1) 35

How much harder would it be to just call the animal shelters within range of where the pet might be? Or they could have just put a chip in their pet or use old school tags on a collar. This doesn't at all seem like the big deal the person in the article is trying to make it out to be.

Maybe it would be nice for pet birds I guess?

Comment Next step, laser defence (Score 1) 312

We're not quite there yet but we're pretty close to wide spread practical laser defense systems to shoot down missiles. I know the Israeli's added laser systems to their Iron Dome for instance. These systems will be far more accurate than current systems and should be able to be used at a fraction of the cost of even these missiles

Comment Re: Nope, POS isn't a big deal (Score 1) 193

I never said we changed tags during store hours. Our store level POS also aren't hanging tags their full shifts, I'm not sure what else we have them doing but it seems like only about half their job or less is physically hanging tags. Our stores are also a pretty good size with more individual SKUs present than most traditional grocery stores given that we're technically a "mix" store which carries both natural foods (like Whole Foods) and conventional food categories although our identity is more on the natural foods side.

POS just isn't a big cost for a grocery stores and given that grocery stores carry more SKUs than most retail businesses that then means POS isn't a major cost for most retail in general.

Comment Re: Well cult followers (Score 1) 334

I hate to tell you this but Whole Foods uses a major natural foods distributor called UNFI for most of its product that delivers to stores in traditional big rigs. I don't think that ruins your whole point but what you're saying in your last post here doesn't match up to reality in regards to Whole Foods.

Comment Nope, POS isn't a big deal (Score 1) 193

What? I currently work for a small chain of grocery stores with a very large product selection. We employ one person full time and split another with another department to do all our store level POS stuff in each store. POS isn't some kind of huge hurtle for a properly staffed store to manage.

Comment Re:Massachusetts is Not Socialist Enough? (Score 3, Insightful) 255

I love how you characterize the mild leftism that is practiced in Massachusetts as people surrendering their liberty. Meanwhile in reality they have the same elections everyone else gets in this country never mind the fact that in "socialist Europe" they don't end up getting presidents who got less votes than the person they were running against like we get here.

Then there's the fact that MAGA is cheering while all our checks and balances are being eliminated by our current leader but it's supposedly the left that is giving up liberty? Nice one.

Comment Re: Seriously ...? (Score 2) 255

Hahaha, I hope that felt good for you because you look the fool with all your strawmen, false characterizations, and name calling. I suppose I also have "TDS" though, what a laugh that you folks have to resort to such name calling because you can't wrap your head around how anyone would have a problem with your dear leader.

Comment And complexity (Score 3, Informative) 87

the selection of a 40 year old 6502 application is interesting,

Not even the application, just a 120 byte-long binary patch.

It may however help if someone identifies a small digestable chunk as security relevant and set it about the task of dealing withi t.

And that chunk doesn't have any weirdness that requires a seasoned and actually human reverse-engineer.
(Think segmented memory model on anything pre "_64" of the x86 family - the kind of madness that can kill Ghidra).

Also, if it's not from the 8bit era or the very early 16bit era, chances are high that this bit of machine code didn't start as hand-written assembler but some higher-level compiled language (C most likely). It might be better to run Ghidra on it and have some future ChatBot trained on making sense of that decompiled code.

In short there so many thousands of blockers that have been carefully avoided by going to that 40 year old 120-byte long patch of 6502 binary.

Comment Good example of why it's wrong (Score 4, Insightful) 87

But what if you had a similarly loose platform but it's running a kiosk and that kiosk software is purportedly designed to keep the user on acceptable rails.

There is a lot of leverage done by the "similarly".

Apple's computers run on 6502.
This was an insanely popular architecture. It's been used in metric shit tons of other hardware from roughly that era. There are insane amounts of resource about this architecture. It was usually programmed in assembly. There has been a lot of patching of binaries back then. These CPUs have also been used in courses and training for a very long time, most of which are easy to come by. So there's an insane amount of material about 6502 instructions , their binary encoding, and general debugging of software on that platform that could be gobbled by the training of the model. The architecture is also extremely simple and straightforward with very little weirdness. It could be possible for something that boils down to a "next word predictor" to not fumble too much.

Anything developed in the modern online era, where you would be interested in finding vulnerabilities is going to be multiple order of magnitude more complex (think more multiple megabytes of firmware not a 120 bytes patch), rely on very weird architecture (a kiosk running on some x86 derivative? one of the later embed architecture that uses multiple weird addressing mode?) and very poorly documented.

Also combine this with the fact that we're very far into the "dimishing returns" part of the AI development, where each minute improvement requires even vastly more resources (insanely large datacenter, power requirement of entire cities) and more training material than available (so "habsburg AI" ?), it's not going to get better easily.

The fact that a chat bot can find a fix a couple of grammar mistake in a short paragraph of English doesn't mean it could generate an entire epic poem in a some dead language like Etruscan (not Indo-European, not that many examples have survived, even less Etruscan-Latin or -Greek bilingual texts have survived to assist understanding).
The fact that a chat bot successfully reverse engineered and debugged a 120-byte snipped of one of the most well studied architecture doesn't mean it will easilly debug multi-mega bytes firmware of some obscure proprietary microcontroller.

Slashdot Top Deals

Your mode of life will be changed to EBCDIC.

Working...