Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:An AMAZING number of flaws (Score 1) 76

MSFT wants to sell you and your enterprise the tools and capacity to bug hunt your own code and allegedly help you "drive costs" out of your operations. I suspect this is more of a "look, we are eating our own dog food!" exercise to drive sales.

They're trying to slap the copilot moniker on anything they can lay a hand on to further that goal. Someone's gotta pay for all that capex they're pushing into their datacenter infrastructure....might as well be you.

Comment Also, the deal involved a bribe (Score 4, Informative) 76

While Paramount claims they cancelled Colbert as a cost cutting move, that makes no sense since other late night shows on other networks with smaller audiences continue. They must make some sort of financial sense.

It is widely understood, though not provable, that the move was a bribe to Trump in order to get the merger approved. Trump has had a longstanding dislike of Colbert because of his commentary on Trump as a person and as the President.

Comment less to do with AI... (Score 1) 61

and perhaps more to do with them failing to shake down their customers for incremental subscription-based revenue streams. Confronted with heavy handed "we're bundling all this extra stuff you don't want or use in with whatever you currently have and we're going to charge you more for all that 'additional value you're getting'....even if you've been shrinking your overall IBM hardware/software footprint."

Hard pass.

Comment Re:The bullwhip effect on supply chains (Score 4, Insightful) 61

When is a hard question. Rationally it should never have blown up this much in the first place (some expansion would be rational, but not like we've seen). Clearly the minds driving this are not rational.

Insanity is notoriously hard to predict. That's why short selling is so risky. The market can clearly remain irrational longer than most people can remain solvent when betting against it.

Comment Re:It took about... (Score 1) 59

Actually, the people who forget that seem to be in the business of marketing and press releases. QC has been the apocalypse that would turn the world on it's head breaking crypto left and right in the next 2 years for at least 10 years now. It still can't do prime factorization better or faster than a sixth grader with a pencil and paper. And the sixth grader won't charge as much.

Perhaps it will be useful one day, but not today. It may well take 100 years. Remember about 3 years ago when the size of quantum computers was going to double overnight? And how it went radio silent shortly after? The problem with QC isn't that it will never get here at all, it's the damned hype machine that promised it would be here now.

It's the same hype machine that told us we would be using crypto currency for all of our everyday transactions by now. The same hype machine that claims AI will replace everyone next year.

Comment Re:How to make an e-Ink display (Score 2) 45

That's not how this works. There are a few ways to send an image to the bare display, but HDMI isn't one of them. If you actually look up the item list from TFS you will see that.

You didn't expect them to actually explain how you could manufacture an e-ink panel starting with sand and some chemicals in your kitchen, did you?

Slashdot Top Deals

The aim of science is to seek the simplest explanations of complex facts. Seek simplicity and distrust it. -- Whitehead.

Working...