website which hosts links to about 150 (as I write this) individually owned receivers all over the world. Can be better reception from different locations.
In the 1997/1998 timeframe, the difference was that the submissions were pretty good, so rubberstamping worked OK. There were still frequent omissions and inaccuracies, but this was further handled by the commentary being exceedingly high quality. Frequently someone working on the technology, project, or software, would chime in with clarification and because comment counts were low the signal would get through the noise.
So no, the "editors" really were never that, but the system worked decently when it was a smaller user base of more knowledgable players. Then as the slide towards uselessness and hostile users began, accounts, scoring, moderation, metamoderation, and so on were all instituted, but there's really no overcoming ignorance in volume.
I would rather not see any stories featuring easy tripe buzz words for a while. This includes: Drones, 3D Printers, and Graphene.
Wow, this apologia is +5 insightful. I guess this shows how the Slashdot mass falls on this issue.
"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a neccessity." - Oscar Wilde