Comment Re: I'd take it (Score 1) 135
And dont pay anywhere close to what they were making.
And dont pay anywhere close to what they were making.
Any subs that follow the TrueWhatever invariably turn into shit.
Hey guys, we told the AI agents to constantly look around and find something to do and so they found something to do, it must be alive.
Buy Other Stereo Equipment
Better Off Something Else
No highs no lows it must be bose
Only one of the exploit chains requires LFI, there's other paths of triggering the exploit
Before you go public, as you control all the shares. What's SpaceX going to do? You think Elmo is going to give up the shares, or is he going to issue 73 million more and dilute the price?
Sounds like 46 more targets of investigation.
Unless they're secretly training on all your chats despite them saying they're not.
I dont see why we cant have it monitored remotely, but controlled, when security of IoT is terrible, then this is a bad design by a company who caters to sales people and not actual engineers who would warn against such things.
Monitoring allows reaction by humans, control brings problems.
Precisely. And in a sane world (15 years ago), people would be pushing for exactly this. Monitoring should be for alerting and observing; control should be distinct, and monitoring should never require the ability to control simply because some manger heard the phrase "autorecovery." Instead, we have this. I'd like to blame the rise of k8s, which made people feel like problems didn't need to be resolved or engineered, but it's also cost and lack of foresight/battle scars.
If these were highly remote locations and getting a human to them in time to fix a problem was going to be a challenge, then maybe remote controllability would be important. But this is a damn supermarket; there's going to be somewhere there or nearby constantly. Dear Lord.
99.9% of that can be solved with allowing the construction of new designs of reactors instead of booting the old ones back up.
Uh, huh, sure.
>You can't use the TV without accepting
You have to accept the top two, but it is perfectly usable without clicking accept on the bottom three. The top two I don't believe (though I haven't double checked) do anything malicious. The bottom ones do.
But the forced obsolescence caused by systemd is fine.
Bus error -- driver executed.