Comment Re:Risk reward and perverse incentives (Score 1) 42
99.9% of that can be solved with allowing the construction of new designs of reactors instead of booting the old ones back up.
99.9% of that can be solved with allowing the construction of new designs of reactors instead of booting the old ones back up.
Uh, huh, sure.
>You can't use the TV without accepting
You have to accept the top two, but it is perfectly usable without clicking accept on the bottom three. The top two I don't believe (though I haven't double checked) do anything malicious. The bottom ones do.
But the forced obsolescence caused by systemd is fine.
If the guardrails are so ineffectual to prevent the thing from happening, then they're not guardrails, they're guidelines.
The system was designed to withstand morons and self-serving grifters.
No it wasn't. The system has glaring flaws in that it requires all members to act in good faith. Soon as they dont, there are zero guardrails.
Who the fuck doesn't do it West to East.
SMHEO
Decades of appealing to the independents is what got us into this mess, they threw away their base.
Once a brain has the opportunity to idle, it will develop further.
Happy Singularity, everyone!
~nt~
But even calling it "evidence" sets up the bias. Destroying data for possible crime is a way to put it, but then that seems like minority report.
Destroying something law enforcement believes is evidence in that moment is literally Obstruction of Justice, and destroying evidence is literally a crime specifically for that reason. There really isn't much grey area here.
Dude, this has been settled case law for centuries. If it weren't, literally all customs inspections at the border would be illegal under Federal law absent an individually-signed search warrant.
You're free to do whatever you want to your own data (subject to previous judicial order), but the moment a legitimate authority -- whether state or local law enforcement or a Federal agency like Customs and Border Control -- indicates that your data/property is subject to search or review, destroying such data is literal obstruction and will get you as much of a charge as if you flushed evidence away while a cop was asking for it.
If the LEO or agency is overstepping their bounds, once you've been put on notice that you're the subject of an investigation the proper remedy is judicial review and a lawsuit. You don't get to #resist, and you certainly don't get to blow up your phone just because someone taught you this One Weird Trick.
Have fun in jail, bro.
No hardware designer should be allowed to produce any piece of hardware until three software guys have signed off for it. -- Andy Tanenbaum