Which probably is much worse, because the increased depth leads to higher decoherence risks. But it hardly matters. This stuff will never scale to useful sizes with useful computation lengths. Nothing exponential ever does unless these sizes are tiny. For QC workloads, useful sizes are large. Factoring 35 does nothing. With the one exceptions of running Physics experiments, but these are not computations, no matter the lies.
Yes. Agree to all of this.
My prediction is that IT regulation and liability will come from the EU, because the EU actually understands that some things need to be controlled or everything goes to shit. In fact, we already have it, in part. The GDPR and, very new and untested, software liability when selling to private customers via consumer protection laws.
The US? They will adopt it when they have really no other choice because nothing works anymore.
True. At least that is MBA thinking. And that is why we need liability and regulation. Amateur-hour in IT is getting massively too expensive.
Which is simply utterly dumb if you have to continue sharing a country. Or a planet.
The difference is that news media skew intentionally, while "AI" is simply dumb.
Totally usable and helpful, right?
Because this could very likely have been prevented or at the very least made much less severe. All it would have taken is doing what the state-of-the-art requires. But no, greed runs supreme.
Because I can really not see them doing anything like that because they though it was right.
There is another one that sticks out to side and indicates that you should not go forward.
Not where I live. They do have a stop sign that flips out to the side.
I do not recommend passing a stopped bus, even if you do not hit anyone.
I'm wondering what I said that made you think I thought otherwise.
Probably. But this is just a legal fiction.
At current scaling progress, you probably need to wait a few billion years for a QC that can actually run a small LLM. Or maybe it is not even possible in this universe.
105 qbits? And how long do they stay entangled when you actually do computations with those? Sounds pretty pathetic to me. And no, you cannot even factorize 32 bit with that, as that is already wayyy too complex.
Throwing around large numbers does not make this thing any less useless.
More like "tiny quantum hop".
The truth hurts if you live your live in delusions. Moderating things down does not change the truth.
Progress means replacing a theory that is wrong with one more subtly wrong.
