Comment Re:Double standard for bots (Score 1) 195
"A double standard between humans and bots"
"A double standard between humans and bots"
...coding models? Are they comparable to the expensive ones?
I want a refund on my See Instant Crater event tickets! They costed me half a bitcoin, dammit!
Musk: "Stupid woke moon, eh, should be locked up or given correctional therapy to, eh, put it into a business-friendly orbit. It's in a socialist orbit right now. Put the socialists in orbit instead, heh heh heh."
Snow, rain, fog, changes in roads, construction, flooding.
Humans fuck those up also. It's just that traffic fortunately tends to be light during bad weather so that our screwups have limited impact. During the last heavy rain I drove in at night I probably made 10+ traffic violations because I couldn't see the damned lines. Fortunately there weren't a lot of other cars around to be co-confused with: the wise stayed home.
And if there is traffic in bad weather, such as work commutes, one just typically follows the person in front of them. If they by chance drove off a cliff I'd probably follow them down. So we have rules-of-thumb that mostly save us, but are highly imperfect.
I believe the goal has to be "better than humans" because humans seem to have a double standard for bots per screwups. Bots F-ing up spread like wildfire on social media.
Maybe we are collectively bigoted against automation, but being bots probably won't lobby to correct that or fight for their (alleged) rights, that's probably the way it will stay (at least until true sentience). Thus, I agree with the premise the driving system must be better than a human driver to be accepted.
What a coincidence, the ideas of Stalin and Mao are not just popular, but being implemented by the DNC!
What ideas are those? Are you familiar with the policies of Stalin and Mao in any way, or are you just parroting something somebody else told you?
FWIW, the First impact was in 1959.
And here I thought the First Impact was billions of years ago, when the Black Moon carrying Lilith crashed into the Earth.
then it's considered beatified behavior.
"Watch SpaceX Crash Into the Moon"
Is the person who ignored Pelosi in the room with you right now?
incresed security (harder to wiretap.)
That's an interesting observation. Yet, apparently, the little widgets at either end of the cable are a potential national security risk.
Too bad, Hawaii said 640 scopes oughtta be enough for anyone. It's their state.
Why not toss in arrogant billionaires instead? Astronomers have use.
thought insects got aboard. They heard buzzing but nobody could actually see any insects. It turned out to be a race of beings who function at high speed, moving so quickly that humans couldn't see them.
They should remake a spy-drone version of that episode. The drones predict if somebody is about to swat at them and quickly shift out of the way.
IN MY OPINION anyone interested in improving himself should not rule out becoming pure energy. -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.