We said [that] to the Department of War
It's Department of Defense, you fucking fascist collaborator.
As TFS points out, Iran cutting off the internet is basically just Tuesday.
The real story is what induced Iranian authorities to cut it off this time.
To give it a tech angle, so that
And, perhaps -- oh, say -- these strikes are meant to distract the American people from the Epstein files.
lol you do know that it's mostly Democrats getting torpedoed by their appearance there, right?
Take a look at the map and behold, most of the Empire is not in fact doing too good: https://www.britannica.com/pla....
The funny part is that you don't realize they are doing worse after leaving the empire.
Morally and ethically, why should small polluters get off? It's not like GHG emissions from any source are that different. I get proportionality, but by what logic do you simply hand wave away small emitters?
Whatever you think of their honesty, the phrase has a single meaning, which is "we're not going to do it" with the additional pretty obvious inference "because it is unethical".
Your post isn't merely pedantry, it's just willful denial of what ultimately is a very clear and unambiguous statement.
That's about 340 million people.
... if you don't like current federal law, it can be changed. Elect people who will change it the way you do like.
We could call it
Obviously, if it's just slop, or totally not you, then don't send it, no matter who made it.
But if it's just a tool to polish a bit? So what?
Yeah, I'd just hate to hire someone who uses tools to help accomplish goals. "Og no need flint to start fire!"
If God is perfect, why did He create discontinuous functions?