What in the actual fuck are those tabs doing eating gigabytes of RAM? And why in the fuck are most Chromium based browser installs now almost a gig of storage?
Never going to say that we can't optimize something better.
But let's get real - the engines have got insanely more capable. We can do things with just CSS now that it took reams of JS to do before, if you could even do them.
But -- we can do that because the browser engine is now capable of it.
But if one ever decides to be a ShaoLin monk
He'd just leave the same day though, being able to lift that burning cauldron with no pain
Yes, you can shoot yourself in the foot with a gun.
You can also use a gun as an excellent tool for security.
I'd recommend the latter, lol
"First documented in 1925, the city's sinking is a result of centuries of exploitation of the groundwater," the report says.
Or we could use the less emotionally charged word, the one that normal people use, which is "use".
CloudFlare was an aggressive global internet surveillance and privacy invasion operation. Now it's an AI-powered aggressive global internet surveillance and privacy invasion operation.
Why don't I feel excited about it?
In a running incident update log that began on May 1, Steve Proud, Instructure's chief information security officer, said that the company had "recently experienced a cybersecurity incident perpetrated by a criminal threat actor."
Steve must be so proud.
No, if you base it on IP address, then it's pointless to lock out attackers because they have more IP addresses than you can ever hope to lock out. And consider your authentication system design, potentially having to keep track of tens of millions of locked IP addresses per user account...
I have never encountered a system that took IP addresses or even networks into account when deciding whether or not to lock an account. If an organization is aware that someone is trying to crack your account and they do use lockouts, but don't lock it out globally, then IMO they are at risk of a lawsuit.
lol okay. I work with a bunch of website clients and multiple hosting companies. We use systems that lock out by individual IP address all the time. E.g. 5 failed login attempts from the same IP address; that address gets blocked (for X hours).
It's not pointless at all; it works well. It's not a panacea - nothing is - but it's a nice layer.
I find it interesting that so much transphobia seems to focus on a particular type of transgendered individual.
I find it interesting that a silly, middle-school level taunt word had to be invented to support a position that can't be supported otherwise.
There is no "phobia". People aren't "afraid" of something that's ridiculous and insane*. There's a reason that so much British comedy used to revolve around cross dressing, lol. Because it's absurd and laughable.
* With logical exceptions. One can be "afraid" of a rabid dog, or of the consequences of a boy in the girl's locker room. But that's a logical form of "fear", not a phobia.
Our current best understanding of consciousness is that it's an after-the-fact rationalisation of the multiple low-level brain processes that converge into a subconscious decision.
Rationalization?
Why would "multiple low-level brain processes" need to "rationalize" (whatever that would mean, if this theory were true)?
Who is rationalizing? Why? And for the benefit of who/what?
Nobody was against the feds spending the money.
It's already spent, so any "refunds" are going to come from the taxpayers. (Or from everybody, via "printing" money and the resultant inflation.)
But okay, Dems will cheerlead transferring money from taxpayers to CEO's. Sounds good
And if you lock an account after a certain number of incorrect guesses... we're back to the DoS situation, where anyone who knows or can guess your login name (often your email address) can lock you out of your account.
No, because (in good setups) you lock out per IP address. The botnet machines locked themselves out, but they didn't lock me out.
Crypto grift, AI bubble and psychopathic billionaire CEO.
Please stop trying to treat LLMs as something they are not.
I'm not - that was the point of my rhetorical question
Yes, that's because there have been a lot more stupid humans doing stupid things to databases for a lot longer than AI agents.
So tell me: if AI is no safer than people, what's the point of replacing humans with AI?
How many Unix hacks does it take to change a light bulb? Let's see, can you use a shell script for that or does it need a C program?
