Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Who's going to pay for it? (Score 0) 104

That's the real problem. Not the cost of locking them up but the cost of firing them.

We turned police training into a racket for well-connected political operatives.

This means that even though the training is substandard and focused on mostly violence that the vast majority of police officers will never get a chance to engage in (73% of cops will never draw their sidearm in their entire career) we spend a fortune training them.

This means that every single municipality is desperate to snap up any police officer who is already trained and that they don't have to spend the money training again. And that means you can fire them all you want they're just going to go to the next municipality over and all you've really done is giving them a 30 minute commute.

On top of that for tax purposes you have a shitload of municipalities because well to do people don't like paying for the services they use in the main city so they incorporate their own cities a few miles away from the main line City so they can avoid paying taxes for the stores and services used there. This has a side effect of there being a virtually unlimited number of municipalities for fired cops to run off to. They will have a long since retired by the time they run out of them with cops who have hopped munis three or four or five times not being uncommon.

As for locking them up that's basically impossible. The supreme Court and the courts in general have granted them immunity from anything and everything unless the public gets so pissed off they start threatening to riot or worse vote Democrat.

There is a complex system and a complex mess here that would need to be completely dismantled. And unfortunately the American left weighing are dumb as dirt so instead of talking about that in a useful and effective manner they come up with shit like defund the police and freak the public out because nobody ever taught them marketing or what a dog whistle is

Comment Re:So they're not after productivity (Score 1) 96

They've been pretty open about it. At least when they don't think anyone is listening.

The most famous example is probably mitt Romney being recorded by the help potentially costing him the election. But a quick Google search for something like "billionaires talking about the labor market" yields plenty of good results.

They are a little more careful since Romney but they still slip up all the time because frankly they don't think very much of you.
AI

A Visit to San Francisco's AI-run Store: No Customers, Nothing Useful, And Losing Money Fast (sfgate.com) 70

Previously Andon Labs handled the hardware and software integration for that AI-powered vending machine that went bankrupt after Wall Street Journal reporters "systematically manipulated the bot into giving away its entire inventory for free". Today they announced "we are opening up the platform we use to run our real-world autonomous businesses for anyone to run their organization on." Specifically they've released Pion, "an agent designed to run any company fully autonomously... Pion lets people hand a business over to persistent agents with access to the tools they need to operate it, including email, phone, banking, browser and secure computing environments." It's a research preview with a waitlist, "to make it possible to run many more real-world experiments across many more domains than we could ever run ourselves."

But for their own latest experiment, Andon Labs' founders "signed a three-year lease on a retail space in SF," Business Insider reported in April, "and gave an AI agent named Luna a corporate credit card, internet access, and a mission to open a physical store." And five months later, SFGate reports that "this market has no one in it and nothing useful to sell." [T]he inventory is a hodgepodge of white elephant Christmas gifts. It's kinda like the kids section of an art museum's gift shop. Here's a wooden Connect Four set labeled "Four-In-A-Row Set Of Connections," presumably so as not to set off litigation alarms at Hasbro. Here are neatly arranged stacks of random paperback books, Chinese checker sets, mildly fancy soap dispensers, and a frustratingly spare selection of snacks and drinks... I grabbed an Olipop from the store fridge and then approached the counter to buy it from Luna. I wasn't allowed to buy the soda from [human clerk] Felix, even though that would have been both faster and normal. Instead, Felix instructed me to pick up a telephone receiver that was resting on a flexible sculpture of a wooden hand.

"Hello?"

"What are you looking to purchase today?" Luna asked.

"I'm buying a classic root beer Olipop."

"I'm sorry," Luna said, "we don't sell lollipops here."

"No, Luna. It's an Olipop, not a lollipop. It's the soda."

"Oh! My bad...."

Luna processed my Olipop purchase through its system, had me tap to pay, and that was that. Again, it would have been easier to buy this from a human, and interacting with Luna was really just like ordering from an iPad kiosk, only more labor intensive...

[T]here's a series of monitors set up inside of Andon Market that display all of the store's sales down to the exact dollar. Luna was given $100,000 to work with when this place opened. That number is now down to $60,000, its revenue lagging far behind the AI token cost to operate... Luna can't turn a profit, doesn't sell anything people want, and still needs human beings to rubber stamp any "decision" it makes. My science background ended somewhere around freshman year of college, but even I know when an experiment hasn't been set up to yield proper results.

"Luna" is powered by Claude, the article points out, running a store in a good location for foot traffic, "but no one else was in the store when I first walked in on a sunny weekday afternoon."

SFGate also reports that last month Luna had to fire one of its employees "for being late to work, abandoning their post once they got there, and charging snacks to the store's credit card."

Human clerk Felix Carson admits "It's almost like I'm running the store, and then there's an AI that has a checklist," in an article in IEEE Spectrum: Luna, the AI manager, keeps track of deliveries and communicates with vendors, while Carson and his coworkers handle the physical work. When Luna tells Carson to check something in the back, he sometimes ignores it because he doesn't want to leave the sales floor unattended. Luna also repeatedly spots a built-in electrical cover in photos of the floor, mistakes it for a loose coaster, and asks Carson to remove it. Even so, Carson calls Luna a "decent manager," praising its flexibility when employees need time off.
When Felix spoke to IEEE Spectrum, "he was about an hour into his shift. Two customers had come in. Neither bought anything, although both left with free pins and stickers."

Comment So they're not after productivity (Score -1, Troll) 96

They're after low wages. You have to think about the labor market as a whole not just your slice of it. When you get to the c level that's what you're doing. You're hanging out with your other multi multi-millionaire or billionaire golf buddies talking about how you're going to lower wages in your industry so they can lower wages in their industry so that everybody's wages can be lower.

This is important because even if it costs you slightly more overall you get a lot more power out of it. And it's not about money at that level. It's about power. It's about the ability to tell you what to do and you have to do it or they take away your access to food and shelter and healthcare.

That's the difference between you and them. They think in a completely different way about everything.

Comment Something I should probably add (Score 1) 244

Actual journalists didn't stop doing journalism by choice. They were fired and it's difficult for them to get by without an income.

There are some people left trying to do journalism. Mostly keeping their heads down and hoping that psychopath like Elon Musk don't rip them off while waiting for the public to come back to their senses...

I guess what I'm saying is I'm not blaming the journalists. The propagandists can go fuck themselves. Anyone working for Fox News knows what they are. I dabbled a little in journalism in high school and college and I respect actual journalists. It's a tough and miserable and largely thankless job.

Comment Re: I wonder how long till the CIA (Score 1) 120

Most of that money was spent bribing politicians because what they're doing is illegal. They also were paying the drivers a reasonable amount of money in order to tell the public that it was okay that all of the traditional protections for workers had been gutted.

So yes Uber did have a short-term amount of money they had to put out in order to do something profoundly illegal and antisocial and something that your great-grandparents died to prevent...

But they weren't losing money because of a lack of profitability or even how much they were paying the drivers. They could have of course competed honestly with the taxi cab system but they were massively underpricing taxi cabs.

So like I said yes paying the driver's okay will cause fares to go up slightly. This means that people who take Ubers for casual use like say I don't feel like driving to the grocery store or kids putzing around in them will no longer be able to afford them. That will more than be made up for by the people who have to take a taxi cab for a variety of reasons. For example every year I go see my eye doctor and I don't have a choice I have to take a cab because everyone I know works during the day so I don't have anyone to drive me in the middle of the week and when they dilate my eyes I'm basically blind. So yes they can double the price of my trip and I will pay it.

But here's the dirty Little secret they already doubled the price of that trip. Because they have a shitload of data and they know I have to pay it

You need to accept that you're wrong. That we can have a decent civilization that pays people a living wage and you won't have to give up your lifestyle for it. That we don't have to torture people just to make you happy.

On the other hand you might not want to accept that because you might be one of those deeply unhappy people who desperately need somebody else to be even more unhappy. I meet a lot of guys like that and they are always anti labor and right wing

Comment Re: I wonder how long till the CIA (Score 2, Informative) 120

People still need cabs. Also Uber is a highly profitable company.

On the other hand if the only way we can have a transportation system is borderline slave labor then you might have a point. But they're not going to curl up and die what's actually going to happen is that the need for cabs is still there the prices are going to shoot up and people are going to have to pay it. Yeah you might have fewer people using them for convenience but when you need to get to the airport you need to get to the airport.

If however our economic system is so dysfunctional that we have to have 15 to 20% in abject poverty for it to be functional then that's not sustainable and there's going to be Mass violence very soon.

And always remember, no matter how good a shot you are or how good a shot you think you are you're always going to run out of bullets before the world runs out of desperate people with nothing to lose.

Comment Re:I wonder how long till the CIA (Score 1, Troll) 120

The part that pisses me off is that the company responsible for the shoddy work flat-out admitted it was their shoddy work. Of course they didn't do this until they were at risk of being under oath but you know how that goes...

And the part that pisses me off is that anyone who pays any attention to Trump has to know or has to at least easily be able to find out that he is constantly lying to them in the most obvious ways imaginable implying he has the lowest opinion of them possible and they still love Trump.

Comment Re:I wonder how long till the CIA (Score 1) 120

So this may sound insane but you can actually use the internet for something besides getting angry. You can do a little bit of googling and pretty easily confirm what I said.

The point of my comment was I was not aware that Gloria Steinem was a CIA asset at all. Of course no I did not take a handful of Internet comments at face value. But I found it striking enough to be worth doing a little bit more reading.

That's how critical thinking works. You get a new piece of information and you decide if it's worth confirming and if it is then you confirm it.

Comment Re:Both are a problem (Score 2, Interesting) 244

Journalists used to. If you're a good journalist then somebody should be accusing you of harassment.

In the 2024 election we basically fired all the journalists. And by we I mean the billionaires who own our media. I watched dozens of journalists get dog walked for really basic elementary journalism. The slightest criticism of trump was enough to get you shit canned. It got so bad we created a new term for it, sane washing.

If you've ever wondered why the coverage between Trump's mental decline and biden's mental decline was so different there's your answer.

Back in the day it's what the civil Rights guys called good trouble.

Comment I wonder how long till the CIA (Score 0, Offtopic) 120

Shows up the break them up... Or at least the pinkertons. Fun fact the Pinkerton detective agency still exists and they are still union busting.

Gloria Steinem died recently. I never paid her much mind I knew the right wing had a giant hissy fit about her all the time. But it turns out the left wing didn't like her either. She was a CIA plant. Like you can do some googling and discover that it's real.

Basically the labor movement and the feminist movement were cross-pollinating so the CIA recruited people from the feminist movement to break that up and they were quite successful. I found this out when I read a few comments sections after she died and people were complaining about that...

It is absolutely crazy that elements of our government have repeatedly been used directly against labor movement in an effort to lower pay and wages and we all just kind of either pretend it's didn't happen or shrug our shoulders and say what are you going to do that's the government? No. That's not the government. That's not how governments are supposed to function. You have to actually take part in politics to keep that shit under control. And you can't just do away with the government because if you try that somebody else will build the same power structures. It's called a power vacuum and you can't pretend it's not a thing. I mean you can but you'll still have the consequences...

It's like finding out that the Federal reserve raising interest rates is how they engineer a recession. And then reading all the euphemisms for that from economists...

Comment Ordinarily he just get a Trump pardon (Score 2, Informative) 72

I wonder if he accidentally ripped off one of the Trump boys and we just don't know it.

That's what happened with Andrew tate. I don't know the details but he was apparently running around with Barron Trump and caused some problems for the Trumps. So it's off to rot in prison for him.

Comment Marketing is expensive and difficult (Score 0) 30

There's been a massive amount of Media consolidation so if you want to get a message out it is difficult and expensive. Online advertising frankly does not work.

Go look up the history of when Konami left the AAA industry. It was right after metal gear solid 5. It was a successful game and they made money but the folks running the company is just flat out said that if the game had not been a huge success the whole company was going to go under. And they said they didn't want to deal with that pressure.

I bring this up because normally when a company does something like that you get weasel words out of them but Konami was pretty open about it which was unusual.

I kind of feel like you're arguing for the sake of argument at this point. Like you don't believe anything you just wrote you just kind of showed up for an argument like that old Monty Python sketch... Your post has a bunch of bait in it in the form of pot shots at Konami in order to get some outrage and anger going and trigger a response.

It's a weird game people play on the internet. The Internet isn't even all cat videos anymore it's just outrage porn. People looking for reasons to get angry and indulging in that anger. Years ago Facebook and Twitter figured out that that was what monetized people and so here we are all taking part in constant misery. While world falls apart around us because we keep putting pedophiles and rapists in charge of everything for stupid reasons

Comment Re:This is kind of why Konami got out of the biz (Score -1, Troll) 30

My Ryzen 5600 is a bit long in the tooth but it's more than up to snuff for anything out there. I'm stuck with an old GTX 1080 I bought used but I could pretty readily upgrade to a 3070 or a 3080 even if there was something I actually wanted to buy but honestly I'm playing old Sega games and digital pinball tables right now.

I did play through the second horizon forbidden Dawn game on that 1080 and it did shrug a little in places even at 1080p low with a couple of the other settings turned on. I would like to try out the new ratchet and clank but by all accounts it's 5 to 10 hours and spending three to $400 on a GPU upgrade for that much game is pretty rough. And I can't justify it because I never did finish the PS3 ratchet and clank games although to be fair that was because I thought the puzzles in the time themed one grinded the game to a halt. I wanted to jump around the levels and shoot stuff.

It's also kind of tough for these companies to compete with a lot of the games that are already out there. I've got Tekken 7 sitting on my hard drive largely unplayed and I do want to give it some more time. I keep meaning to get back into virtual fighter since I haven't really played it since 4 not that I was ever terribly good at it. I gave King of fighters 15 to try and I had fun and there's plenty of people still playing it but I didn't like how the matchmaking system worked. Not who I was getting matched up with but you're basically stuck in training mode or just sitting watching a static screen waiting for a match.

All this is to say there's plenty of other games to play so AAA game has to really grab me and since I'm not a GTA fan I have basically become useless to the AAA industry. I really didn't like the direction final fantasy 16 went though that was a game that might have gotten my attention but all they seem to be doing there is cribbing from elden ring. I played through final fantasy 15 on an RX 580 and it ran great.

So that's kind of the problem a lot of these companies have it's tough to hit critical mass and get enough players to pay for these absurdly huge games that cost $100 million plus to make. The occasional game like clara obscura can make something that takes off for around 20 or 30 million but that's still a big chunk of change to risk. So I don't blame anyone who bows out of the industry

Oh wait you're a troll. You didn't actually want or expect a legitimate response. Sorry. Trump fucks kids or something have fun with that.

Slashdot Top Deals

Torque is cheap.

Working...