People are using this particular feature. I don't really understand why, but reports are they do like it.

Apparently even Debian is supporting it (despite the summary): https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/a...

It turns out some people are using it. I don't know why, but from time to time they submit bug reports and patches.

So if people are using it, there's no real reason to remove it. If some people don't want it in their version of the kernel, a compile flag works fine.

The only thing that matters is whether people are using it.

If people are not using it, then remove it. If people are using it, leave it in. If somehow it still bothers you (I don't know why), then you can add a compile flag so it is not in your particular kernel.

A lot of people doubt that Iran was/is trying to make a nuclear weapon.

How do they keep the proteins from denaturing?

RTFA.

I didn't rail against Rust. It's fine. LTR

A software engineer says, "Yes, I've developed techniques for avoiding entire classes of bugs in C, but there are a few types I'm still struggling with."

Someone who has not yet developed the engineering mindset immediately comes up with excuses. "We can't do that."

An engineer looks for solutions, not excuses. It's easy to tell the difference once you recognize it.

Black Rock has been building data centers as an investment vehicle. It's not clear whether they are all being used or not.

That is to say, they are definitely not all being used. Whether or not a meaningful percentage of them are being left unused is still an open question.

I hope I never work with you.

Ok, time for some programming advice you should have learned right after college.

Every time you write a bug, ask yourself, "How do I avoid this bug in the future? What can I change?"

Start doing it, and your code will quickly improve.

You clearly didn't read my comment.

Apparently it's also called perfect randomness.

The numbers are just symbols. You can use anything, even A,B,C,D,E,F

It's really hard to take you seriously when both of your definitions are circular. Get a better dictionary.

They claim each outcome has precisely the same probability. For contrast, a die has small imperfections making some outcomes more likely than the others, or a coin is not perfectly weighted making very small imbalances in the probability.

I don't understand how they did it, but that is what they are claiming.