Depends.

Vulkan backends tend to work, but not perform great.
ROCm on strix is a fucking nightmare.

I agree that the issue is far to complex to say something like "Israel is... blah... muslims."
Israel is full of great human beings.
Unfortunately, it's also run by some of the worst on the planet.

Likud's 1977 manifesto calls for direct Israeli sovereignty from the River To The Sea.
Since there are more Muslims than Jews in that geographical area, what do you think Likud was really calling for?

Now, if we don't grant them the benefit of the doubt that Likud was... lol... calling for a multiethnic state where Jews were a minority, and paint their actions in that period in that lens, only a few things are possible. They were calling for genocide, ethnic cleansing, or apartheid- or some mix of the 3.

Frankly, it checks out.

None, actually.

Though getting all the goodies you need on a veggie diet is indeed quite the task- fortified foods and supplements are generally easier.
This even applies for meat-eating diets, which is why many foods in the US are fortified.

Vegans are kind of in a class all their own since they refuse to touch anything that's an animal product, up to, and including fucking honey.

Also Italy, Ireland, France, Poland, Malta, Spain, Romania, Cyprus, Montenegro...
But really, all of those, the US, and the rest of Europe are right in a pretty narrow range of reasonable*.

*in that any country is reasonable.

I blame the stupid fucking catchphrase. It was fodder for idiots like the person you replied to. The idea itself, isn't bad at all.

An excellent question, child.

The phrase, and even the concept arises from the 1977 Likud manifesto.
Let that sink in.

Defunding police is a about enabling anarchy. The rest is the shit they feed you—and you willingly lap up—to rationalize this.

Whipping up an LM to be mated to a CSM isn't exactly something we haven't done before.
Apollo's LM cost ~$300M (in today's dollars) from blueprint to stacking.

It's not a comparable mission in the slightest, as the LM is tiny and has highly limited capacity and longevity- but that was the point. This isn't about "getting back to the moon".

Neither can SpaceX.
That's not in their mission profile at all.

Astronauts will be coming home on Orion.

By my math, they will only need to crash 6 rockets into the moon to work out the bugs, each requiring 5 refuelings to get an empty Starship to the lunar surface.
36 successful Starship launches should be no problem for SpaceX.

The SRBs and RS25 are great thrust providers.
An RS25 is far better than any Raptor built at any job except for being easily refuelable on Mars.

There were logical reasons for that.

SuperHeavy is indeed a pretty rad booster.
As for lower cost to orbit, if we're using the metric by which you would measure NASA's via SLS, SpaceX is currently sitting at around $2 billion per kg.

Will it get lower? Sure- once they start putting StarLinks up there and subsidizing the launches with them.

Beating China to the moon is easy. This is about quite a lot more than that.
SLS Block 2 is quite capable of "getting back to the moon" without 16 Starship launches.

No, it most certainly does not.
You are correct that it doesn't sit on the moon, though.

One is definitely curious what tribe "calling Musk out for his shit" puts one in.
Objectivity tribe?

I'm not "confused" about any of this. Don't confuse fictional confusion for you're own double standards and cognitive dissonance.