Comment Re: Ok, so since market has started ignoring him (Score 1) 187
I think there's some nuance needed there.
There's no nuance here. The only nuance is if you want to say one is worth than the other, but you don't need nuance for that (Trump is clearly worse).
When it comes to insider trading sort of things, both of them are shit, along with a whole lot of other politicians, and I say that as a San Francisco voter. If insider trading were the worse that Trump had ever done, I would have a much higher opinion of him.
Comment Re:Not an LLM (Score 1) 144
Saying "expert mathematicians are working the prompt" isn't a misrepresentation, it is how things are.
You are so hypersensitive to criticism against LLMs, that you see criticism where it is not. Why is that?
Comment Re:Perhaps (Score 1) 78
Comment Re:For us non-metric countries (Score 1) 78
August is the hot time in Seoul, when we wish a typhoon for the coolness.
Comment Re:Well gee wiz! (Score 1) 78
You are right about floor units, and I'd add that they don't work very well. I had one for a few years and only kept it because I was too stingy to upgrade but it was wretchedly weak.
Comment Re:Well gee wiz! (Score 1) 78
Comment Re:Not an LLM (Score 1) 144
This isn't a gotcha
Something is wrong with you if you thought that was a gotcha. Fix yourself.
Comment Re: Reddit for [Funny] Human Content (Score 1) 82
Comment Re: Hold on to your papers... (Score 1) 144
. for example a famous gene like TP53 (which causes cancer when fucked) has tens of thousands of publications made about it (though ironically there's likely still stuff it does that we don't know).
That's not really glamor, curing cancer is an important practical problem. It's a good thing that money and attention are directed towards that.
Comment Not an LLM (Score 5, Informative) 144
The work openAI is doing isn't just saying, "ChatGPT, solve this problem." They have combined their LLM (probably a custom LLM, with a math focus) with existing algorithms, and expert mathematicians working the prompt.
So this appears to be an incremental advance, but it's not that an LLM automatically understands math and can start proving things.
Comment Re:"Amazing but oversold" (Score 1) 144
The cost of producing a hard answer just fell to almost nothing, and the constraint moved to proving the answer is right.
I don't think this is a change.
For example, Fermat's last theorem was easily produced, and the proving the answer took centuries.
Comment Re:Who's providing the "incentive" to do this. (Score 1) 159
Anything you hand out is going to be 'a platform' and normalize it for the students(not necessarily a point in its favor; people tend to resent the deliberate limitations of hardware that IT has been told to at least try to make less useful for porn and cheating); but there is a potential difference in versatility and vendor flexibility between people actually adopting some macOS stuff and people concluding that chromebooks have been getting more expensive at an alarming clip, without feeling any less cheap, so Apple is now genuinely competitive even if you are just going to slap managed chrome on there and reuse your existing, chromebook focused, IT and curriculum stuff.
Comment Re:"Human perspective" LOL (Score 1) 82
Truth Social I'm sure. As hard as it is to believe, there are still people who think Trump is a genius, and still want to "own the Libs".
Comment Re: Let's not let the Document Foundation promote (Score 1) 82
To be fair, normal users probably will never see this press release. This is more for the