And not only that, some form of that life has to evolve with enough IQ and stick around long enough to invent radio technology.

Mars still has remnants of an atmosphere even with no useful magnetic field and 1/3rd the gravity.

So your small team throws a load of generated crap over the fence and expects someone else to verify the mess. But hey, it compiles and appears to work, right?

Clearly you didnt write much code in those 2 weeks back in the day. If you were really the pro you pretend to be you d know proper unit testing and integration takes up at least as much time as writing the code if not considerably more.

Good luck when you have no one in IT left and have to rely in AI for everything. The effects if the kool aid will wear off you fast at that point, trust me.

Just because that's what powers a lit of life on earth doesnt mean it has to be the same elsewhere. Pretty much any reactive gas would do the job , eg chlorine, of which there is plenty in various salts and minerals.

Not to mention the pollution from the launches. Counting down the years until Kessler kicks in.

Idiots think anything they cant immediately figure out especially in twilight or the dark is strange and pilots are no exception. They're not geniuses, they're airborne bus drivers. Idiots think venus is a ufo, ditto aircraft landing lights from a distance that look like a floating orb that suddenly disappears - ie when the aircraft turns. Even worse with chopper lights.

And exactly how many pilots would have known there were experimental triangular shaped aircraft being tested by the military back then? Plenty of sightings were explained by their aircraft.

Presumably you're being ironic and arnt so cretinously stupid that you didnt get the OPs blindingly obvious sarcasm.

A lot of those back in the 70s were almost certainly sightings of prototype F-117 and B-2s.

... was a picture of the chinese balloon being blown up with an "unidentified orb" in the background - normally called Venus.

LPR surveillance is unconstitutional.

No, it is not. There is no such article in the Constitution.

If they want to use LPR information, then make it a warranting process.

Ah, you're implying, the 4th Amendment covers license plates? No, it doesn't — the license is outside in plain sight. If I can legally see it, I can record it.

Now, the very requirement to have the license plate in the first place — that seems quite bogus to me. Not unconstitutional — just wrong. There is no argument for license plates on personal vehicles on the road, that wouldn't also apply to actual persons on the same road...

It's getting worse these days with posts like the parent, just AI slop. I dunno why these ACs even bother, who tf do they think will read that meandering crap?

Its not their machine you clown, its the company machine. When you leave school and get a job maybe youll get a clue.