Funny, my shitty candidate just won the election and is still fairly popular (it's early days), so I literally do not know what any of this means.
I am laughing, at you
But you're so intense and cryptic! Do you wear plaid and stripes together too?
Stunning lack of evidence for his claim
TL;DR. Try again.
I have recommended giving the already known alternatives just one chance.
Tut tut. Don't play coy. It's one thing to pine for some generic 3rd party candidate, another to think either Stein or Johnson are worth a good god damn. You like to traffic in 'flawed candidate' analysis, just not where its a little closer to home, eh?
Citizens United was a perfectly fair ruling.
Thanks for confirming my suspicions that you are, in fact, a Republican!
You won't get away with blaming the money here.
In your private alternative universe? Sure. Meanwhile, in the rest of the world, the conversation is a little more nuanced.
Because the requirements for amendment are so high: 67% of both HoC, or 75% of all States. Literally undemocratic, unless your definition of majority rule is sufficiently elastic.
The constitution is an operating manual.
Well, that's a slightly better euphemism than the last one, I suppose.
It is still perfectly serviceable to this day, and the procedure for modifying it is all spelled out very clearly, maybe too clearly for you.
Hehehe, spoken like a true conservative.