Great, now you are arguing in semantics. So tell me:
- What was the Roman salute?
- What was Roman about it?
- Was it different for Romans and non-Romans living in Constantinople/Rome?

This is the problem with dealing with disingenuous people. You know very well what is colloquially known as "Roman salute". You know very well that it was invented by idiots and used by Nazis who to shepherd idiots. But you want to argue that Roman is a valid adjective for whatever salute happened thousands of years ago so that the Nazis can hide in their make-shift cocoon of being technically correct.

And what did I say?

According to an apocryphal legend, the fascist gesture was based on a customary greeting which was claimed to have been used in ancient Rome.[2] However, no Roman text describes such a gesture, and the Roman works of art that display salutational gestures bear little resemblance to the modern "Roman" salute.[2]

Google-foo for reference. I would assume people would do at least that much before commenting. But it seems reddit has leaked to Slashdot while older generation dies off.

Please man, I want to have some an interesting conversation.

Marx didn't write communist manifest. Can you find a PDF of Das Kapital and search for the word communism in it?

No I am asking you to read a book. Any book.

Tell me you don't know anything about Marx and has not seen Das Kapital in your lifetime without telling me.

Are you trying to be funny? Because you know there is no such thing as Roman salute

You know what is funny? They could fix this using claude

You don't remember everything. As soon as OpenAI had a useful product, Elon Musk offered to buy it out and Sam Altman refused and shopped around for a better investor with more money and less controlling stake i.e. Microsoft.

This is Indian judiciary, which emanated from the British Crown, not the bureaucracy which emanated from whites serving the Crown.

The only punishment he is looking at is stern "observation" and maybe a life-long ban on promotion.

Horizon Worlds still exists?

I want my tomb stone to say, I tried my best. - Naom Chomsky

But we're not talking about GM forcing you to use their own system. We're talking about GM forcing you to use Android Automotive ("Google Built-in"). They are ditching their own system.

There's no fee for the service. There's no fee for the basic cell service, and my car came with 8 years of the higher tier service (that allows streaming), but you can tether the car to WiFi from a phone and be able to access those features.

GM DOES push OnStar still. In my car, there's an OnStar safety package thing (which is free for 3 years?), and you need to pay some sort of fee to use the built-in cell modem as a WiFi bridge after 1 year (IIRC). I believe that after 8 years, there's a fee for certain services (namely audio streaming).

I think pretty much every car company is now charging to use the cellular modem in some way or another. Typically the basic services are free, and "premium" services (real-time traffic and weather, and streaming services seem to be key). In the case of my car, GM charges to you enable the WiFi hotpost the same way my cell-service provider used to (but no longer does).

Google. We're talking about GM switching to Android Automotive, so GM only updates car-specific drivers. The OS and apps are all Android and updated by Google.