Comment Re:AvantSlash (Score 1) 166
If you fix anything on the mobile site, please remove the stupid "filtered due to preferences" message.
Yes to this! I never even visit the site on my phone because that makes reading the comments almost unusable.
If you fix anything on the mobile site, please remove the stupid "filtered due to preferences" message.
Yes to this! I never even visit the site on my phone because that makes reading the comments almost unusable.
What the article fails to mention is any reasonable measure of geographical range.
"PlaNet is able to localize 3.6 percent of the images at street-level accuracy and 10.1 percent at city-level accuracy," say Weyand and co. Whatâ(TM)s more, the machine determines the country of origin in a further 28.4 percent of the photos and the continent in 48.0 percent of them.
The real news here is the claim that the software/network can pinpoint as well as a human can. And I'd like to see that tested.
"In total, PlaNet won 28 of the 50 rounds with a median localization error of 1131.7 km, while the median human localization error was 2320.75 km."
I know it's standard practice here to comment without reading the article. But why specifically stare that it doesn't contain exactly the information that it does?
Bad Astronomy talks about the odds of getting killed by one as 1:700,000.
I thought that 700,000 number looked suspiciously low, but when allowing for a "humanity extinct" situation, the large population cancels out the small chance to some extent. I wonder what problems we spend an inordinate amount of resources on that are less of a threat. Intuitively, once every 100,000,000 years seems like nothing to worry about, but the damage is unimaginable. It seems like the inverse at the other end of the scale from the "don't worry about driving but afraid to get on a plane" thing.
Well I'm sorry. I'm not Tony Stark.
The actor who says that line is Ralphie from A Christmas Story.
I am NOMAD!