And yet they continue to try to push it, like it's so important for them to screenscrap all of us and record our lives.

I don't even understand the argument from the management side. Like, this is a security risk in their own production environment, why would they think it's a good idea in a broader environment.

You are understanding it incorrectly.

The definition you are pointing at is for generation capacity. The numbers in this article are storage capacity.

Line from the government source for the number:

"In July 2024, more than 20.7 GW of battery energy storage capacity was available in the United States."

https://www.eia.gov/todayinene...

The person who wrote the article made an incorrect statement because they compared two different types of measurements and the commenter your replying to is correct.

Is this satire? I can't tell.

Because nothing you said is true and the tone makes it feel like satire.

"That not withstanding, Wilson's statements are based on legal facts, and her opinion that Khan has already ruined any sense of impartiality is at least a logical opinion given her statements."

Which legal facts? I read the entire opinion piece and she presents nothing. It's 90% rhetoric and 10% unconfirmed accusations.

Also, to call someone else bias and then only post links to heavily biased sources is like calling the pot calling the kettle black.

US Chamber of Commerce is heavily right-wing and so is the RealClearMarkets.com website.

You say "nobody is handing kids assault rifles" and yet literally the shooting being discussed had the assault rifles bought by adults and given to the kid.

So, you are wrong.

Either stop speaking in absolutes or stop spreading disingenuous arguments. You're not helping any side of the discussion.

Fox News, shock jocks and the gradual reduction of censored speech by the government to the point that lies and hate are free to be spewed by even licensed broadcasters.

Krebs is a pretty big creep. He changes his articles often many times after publishing without explanation and deletes comments on his articles that poke holes in his narrative.

So, what you see in the article today might not be what was in the article originally and half of the post was probably submitted by readers.

So, you're saying a government crushed a working automobile with working parts after it being impounded for less than a week?

Seems very implausible.

No information comes up searching for any of the name and location mentioned either even though I am sure if this were true there would be lots of drama posts on social media.

The number of people who seem ready to do mental gymnastics to pardon abusive behavior is ridiculous.

Please get help for your mental health issues. Stop making excuses for people actively trying to hurt others.

Someone please up vote this. Thanks!

Currency is not debt. Gold and silver are not currency, they are commodities that were used as currency standards.

Removing convertibility of a currency to a commodity is not a default, albeit could be argued a devaluing depending on the circumstances.

He wants the format to switch to what he's good at so he wins more.

His explanation for why to do that is just a cover.

Was using Notepad the other day and when you highlight text then right click, there's an option to "Search with Bing".

Have not seen a way to change the default search for it, but they are really starting to push their web properties through desktop IP.

Please provide names and locations for all individuals mentioned so your claims can be verified.

What period of time does this data represent?

A day, a week, a month...what?