Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Trump lost by millions (Score 1) 331

So far he's picking up votes in every state where there is a recount. I guess that's working out well. Then again, if you're against the electoral college you're basically saying "fuck you" to everyone who doesn't live in a major city. Brilliant plan of course for the people who support that, that's how revolutions happen.

Comment Re:commercial advantages (Score 1) 44

So doing it for political or military advantages is fine?

Sure. Long as it's disavowed and neither side gets caught, and with luck no gigantic wars are started. Been like that for hundreds of years. It was the standard MO of the USSR, US, UK, Canada, etc. The only difference between "hacking" a target and requiring a warm body to do the stealing is the era it's happening in.

Comment Re:Lovely...with no pressing issues... (Score 1) 134

Monsef herself is *not* an illegal immigrant.

Immigration law actually says this is *not* true. Her parents filed incorrect information, she willingly filed the incorrect information and didn't correct it either. There is an actual process before Immigration Canada that's offered as a clemency when a parent illegitimately files the wrong country of origin. The only difference between her and someone else? She's got political leverage because she's in cabinet. It was still illegal, and Trudeau waved his hands over it along with the media.

Comment Re:Lovely...with no pressing issues... (Score 1) 134

I truly wonder if the act is the problem or the person, because I think if it was "your guy" you would be praising him as a great leader promoting valuable skills, but since this is not the case, he is wasting time.

Why don't you go and check my posts over the last decade and change. I'll wait while you make an ass out of yourself.

Comment Re:Lovely...with no pressing issues... (Score 1) 134

No there shouldn't be a referendum. Our electoral system needs to be updated and the average Canadian either doesn't care enough to do the research or is too easily swayed by political propaganda to make effective decisions.

So you're saying that the government should operate as a fiat of the prime minster and the cabinet. National issue, national debate. Otherwise it's no different then a dictator. It didn't fly with the Quebeckers tried to leave Canada and tried pushing it through the MLA either. But it would be the same with attempting to amend the Charter.

We need some form of proportional representation with run off ballots so we don't get another shit head like Harper elected because the Liberal / NDP / Green voters (who are the majority of Canadians) aren't stuck with a party and a prime minister that only acquired ~40% of the vote.

Remember that part about the right not to vote is also guaranteed? But we'll come back to some other parts of what you just said.

. I also don't see how the Liberal policy decisions are more out of touch than the Conservatives who basically bet everything on big oil, silenced scientists, implemented policies that made the rich richer and tried to bend, break and bully their way through everything that stood in there way, including the Canadian Judicial system.

You mean those Conservative policies that the Liberals had equally enforced when they were in power? But those scientists only complained when the Conservatives were in power? Or that "everything on oil" which wasn't the case(FYI real estate is by far the biggest GDP item in Canada). And it was the Liberals who started Canada down that path in the 1970's with the NEP. The same NEP that was so messed up that Trudeau Sr., had to implement wage and price controls. Or that almost all PM's have gained national party standing by the same methods.

including the Canadian Judicial system.

Reminder that it was the Liberals that revoked the right to property ownership in Canada, when patriation was in the works. And some of the greatest and most egregious charter violations happened under the Liberals watch, with the GC pushing for them.

I'm only saying this about the Federal Liberals though. In contrast, I think the Ontario Liberals should serve jail time for the gross incompetence they've displayed.

That I can 100% agree with. But let me know when you get Toronto to stop voting for them, and between 23-30% of the province is directly employed by them.

Comment Re:Pretty cool (Score 1) 134

Depends on where you are. FYI: If you live in Toronto, ON., you're not going to survive on $10-11/hr. If you live in Innerkip, ON., you'll be just fine. In turn, if you're in Edmonton, AB., $12.60 will get you far if you're smart. But you'll be turning to the food bank or a local church if you're in Grande Cache, AB. Especially at $6/gal for milk and $8/loaf of bread.

Comment Re:Lovely...with no pressing issues... (Score 1) 134

While it'll probably take way too long to discuss all the cited issue pro and con and the reasoning of Canada's prime minister behind those decision, a quick 3-hour codding + tweet to promote studding and codding is a pretty efficient move by the Prime minister don't you think?

Sure, why don't you explain how a snoopers charter is beneficial to Canada and how it doesn't violate S.1 of the Charter of Rights and freedoms while ignoring all previous legal precedent. Including the SCC's more recent affirmation that even exigent circumstances is too broad of a power to allow the police to use.

Comment Re:Lovely...with no pressing issues... (Score 2) 134

but I do have to say that Trudeau has a couple hundred thousand employees plus an entire Cabinet of supposedly competent politicians who's collective job is to sort that stuff out and generally keep things running.

Check that cabinet again. Most of those people don't have the skills for those positions, let alone any experience in the areas that they're assigned to. Which is why the policy decisions by them are so broadly out of touch, and backwards(immigration, heritage, trade, industry canada, etc). This is the same cabinet and group of people that wanted "electoral reform" and stomped their feet that "they didn't need a referendum because they knew best." Then tried stacking the committee full of Liberals and activists who were donors to the Liberals. Until the Conservatives, NDP and Parti Quebecois started talking about filing a federal suit against the Liberals. Suddenly those minority parties were included, and again so suddenly decided that well...really...we should have a referendum. That's being the kindest that you can apply to them. You can toss the illegal immigrant on there to boot if you want.

Comment Re:Lovely...with no pressing issues... (Score 0) 134

Seriously? With all the various legitimate criticisms of the government, you went with THAT?

I have no words.

What? You mean besides everything else. Or should I also toss in the illegal immigrant he put into a cabinet position as well? Personally I have a problem with anybody that believes that traits you're born with are more important then your skills and ability. Trudeau however prefers his sexism to include the unskilled and unrefined to boot.

Comment Re:Lovely...with no pressing issues... (Score 2) 134

Had Canadians wanted to deal with real issues they wouldn't have elected a feminist government.

Well it sure worked out well for Sweden. On top of that, he's done a great job of showing everyone how much he dislike meritocracy and is pro-sexism he really is with his "diversity cabinet."

Comment Lovely...with no pressing issues... (Score 3, Informative) 134

And with no pressing issues in Canada, all is safe. With energy costs(from gasoline, electricity to natural gas) that are going through the roof in nearly every province. Never mind that Canada is teetering either on a deflationary spiral or hyperinflation spiral(depending on which way the housing market goes). A housing market so hot that it makes the late 1980's housing market seem like a balmy day, and CHMC(think freddie-fanie) mortgages arrears and foreclosures are increasing. Serious regional unemployment numbers, but believes importing *more* people is a great plan--especially TFW's who could be hired at any job(unlike H1B's which are limited to one area) with wanting to have a population in Canada of 100m in 50 years. His pay-for-play access scandal. A carbon tax that's going to jack the prices of everything up by around 20%, a declining service and manufacturing industry. Rampant debt and overzealous expenditure projects that in the previous government would have every left-wing media publication screaming from the rooftop about how we can't afford it.

And has decided that he wants to spy on every single Canadian, and pass a bill just like the snoopers charter in the UK. With mandatory decryption, backdoors, subscriber info and retention logging But he's got time to make a video game....so we're all safe.

Comment Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? (Score 1) 779

Apparently you can't read either, or not very well. Do you need me to break down the stats and use criminology to explain why my point was correct? Or do you want to learn on your own, I suggest the latter. It's an interesting field of science.

In August of 2015 the Post zeroed in on unarmed black men, who the paper said were seven times more likely than unarmed white men to die by police gunfire. The article noted that 24 of the 60 âoeunarmedâ deaths up to that date â" some 40 percent â" were of black men, helping to explain "why outrage continues to simmer a year after Ferguson." By yearâ(TM)s end, there were 36 unarmed black men (and two black women) and 31 unarmed white men (and one white woman) among the total 987 victims. The rate at which unarmed black men were more likely than unarmed white men to die by police gunfire had dropped, but was still six-to-one.

But the numbers donâ(TM)t tell the whole story. It is worth looking at the specific cases included in the Postâ(TM)s unarmed victim classification in some detail, since that category is the most politically explosive. The âoeunarmedâ label is literally accurate, but it frequently fails to convey highly-charged policing situations. In a number of cases, if the victim ended up being unarmed, it was certainly not for lack of trying. At least five black victims had reportedly tried to grab the officerâ(TM)s gun, or had been beating the cop with his own equipment. Some were shot from an accidental discharge triggered by their own assault on the officer. And two individuals included in the Postâ(TM)s âoeunarmed black victimsâ category were struck by stray bullets aimed at someone else in justified cop shootings. If the victims were not the intended targets, then racism could have played no role in their deaths.

Slashdot Top Deals

FORTUNE'S FUN FACTS TO KNOW AND TELL: A cucumber is not a vegetable but a fruit.

Working...