Since you apparently do not know what an AI Winter is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

What a stupid response. If you want a real discussion, maybe accept that the world is not black and white but shades of gray.

In the matter at hand, yes, people can learn, even if they do not do it always and the ones that refuse, you can get rid of. No, the same is not true for LLMs. They cannot learn from what you explain to them. And that makes them unusable for most things that are a tiny bit more advanced.

That should be "by now noticeable".

Typo. "not" -> "now". For some reason my motor-cortex thinks it needs to do that and I do not always catch it.

Because what makes games good is creativity and ideas. LLMs cannot do these. And slop is by not noticeable to most people.

The funny thing is that the AI bros deeply believe they are the future, when it is pretty clear they are not.

Humans learn or get fired. LLMs do not.

Greed. It has happened in the crapto space time and again. It also has been happening in regular banking, until they got regulated very strictly.

No argument. This is not for practical use as it does not make any sense on the engineering side at all. This is a stunt to boost business. This is about pushing idiots already deeply in awe of LLMs to use them even more. A new and basically untried technology that we already know has massive problems, but can perform impressive stunts.

This whole thing sound very, very wrong. Like they stole this themselves and that is the reason they even have the money.

Porn stars. At least back when I quit WP, one of the things that sent me over the top was that every minor porn star (especially female) apparently deserved their own page, while scientists didn't even if they had numerous published articles and citation and done important work - but their field was nothing famous.

In theory.

If you follow actual notability discussions, they are largely about "this isn't important".

The deletionists are one of the reasons I stopped contributing to Wikipedia. It's not like you need to fit into a 20-volume print edition, idiots. You can give every damn porn star who's been in one clip you liked their own page, why not everyone else? For all I care, every human on the planet could have their own page, and every house with a story, and every dog and cat.

Just imagine if the amount of time and energy spent on the deletion discussions alone would go into improving WP instead.

Or, you know, you could use the time to do something about the people hogging their favorite page and considering it their property and reverting everyone else's edits just because it wasn't made by them. Or one of the other dozen issues the site has. But no, whether or not Xav deserves a page, that's what needs discussion. Fuck off.

Indeed. If they are stupid enough, this may be the point where the deadly mistakes happen.

Hahahha, no. Well, the stupid ones do. But the rest is very suspicious about this tech.

Cisco software and firmware is notoriously insecure. While LLMs will probably make that worse (and there is no way to do it with actually competent review in a few weeks), it may not be that much worse. Of course, "Comprehension Debt" (where nobody really knows the code anymore, and hence nobody can fix vulnerabilities) could still make this a total catastrophe.