Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:I am glad (Score 1) 193

Just got an email from United. (They use Newark as a hub so they are at a big risk of cancellations) They say anyone can get a refund from them -- even people with bottom of the line economy tickets. They also say they don't plan on cancelling international flights. The most at risk for cancellations are domestic flights to a non hub city. Travel insurance should pay too but I'd much rather get it directly from the airline.

Comment Re:I don't see where Salesforce is at fault here (Score 1) 28

While it's not Salesforce's fault, they certainly fear losing the customers

No, that might be a reasonable inference if they were paying the ransom, but they actually are refusing to pay it.
So they probably do not fear losing the customers.
They're not selling a product people buy on a whim, and large customers have limited options. If another company is offering similar services, they'll have the exact same exposure; if they're allowed to connect apps to their service, then it is up to them not to let their own employees connect malicious apps. If they didn't need to connect apps to the service, they probably wouldn't be paying to do so.

Comment Re:This will end in disaster (Score 1) 60

Your link doesn't say anything about F15's being mistaken for drones. What it says is:

A spokesperson for USAF in Europe said: "We can confirm that small unmanned aerial systems [UASs] were spotted in the vicinity of and over RAF Lakenheath, RAF Mildenhall and RAF Feltwell.

"The number of UASs fluctuated and they ranged in size/configuration.

"The UASs were actively monitored and installation leaders determined that none of the incursions impacted base residents or critical infrastructure."

It also doesn't say the drones in New Jersey were "scheduled night flights of passenger jets and helicopters."
What it does say is,

"After research and study, the drones that were flying over New Jersey in large numbers were authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons"

The question isn't what the hell "they" are smoking, it's what the hell you are smoking. Though I suspect that's not the problem.

You're ready to accuse others of "hysteria" when actually you're just reciting a narrative that hasn't be established as fact, and since you're citing authorities that contradict your narrative thinking they would support it, the only reasonable conclusion is that you're an idiot who doesn't read anything and is functionally illiterate.

Numerous government sources have confirmed that the drones seen on the East Coast existed, were authorized by the government, and their mission was secret in nature.

In the UK military base incursions, the latest reporting is that the airports have increased security and many in government suspect foreign intelligence involvement.

Using web search to attempt to find stories to support your preferred narrative is pretty transparent to people who read the news every day their whole life.

Comment Re:Flock is leading the way (Score 1) 144

The same company is installing mass-surveillance cameras, free (so far, pending lawsuits) of the restrictions placed on law enforcement, when the whole purpose of the cameras is that they give the data to police, who are paying them to do it.

That's the dystopian part people would be talking about in reference to Flock.

Do you live under a fucking rock or something?

Comment Re:RF Jammers (Score 1) 144

I've been waved through by staff even though the alarm went off and I stopped. They just waved me through.

In the past 20 years I've only been waved through I've never even had a receipt checked in that situation.

The purpose of the alarm at this point seems to actually be to get somebody in the security room to check the video. They should probably just turn the beepers off.

Slashdot Top Deals

ASCII a stupid question, you get an EBCDIC answer.

Working...